To explain the wisdom: Smaller anchors are an option opened up by using redundancy, which otherwise you might refer to as "you're crazy for climbing on that shit anchor!"
Sketchy access is enabled by redundancy.
You don't use a sketchy bad tip, you use a combined tip system - the fundamental difference in thought when you don't settle for an all your eggs in one basket life/career ending fail/fail possibility.
Call it the more conservative, safer approach. Statistics, the unknown/unpredictable, etc... Come out of a statistical inevitability in one piece - a proactive plan to ensure that's always the case. This is the nature of this problem solving. Think of the DRT fall stories you know.
It takes a little pondering outside traditional DRT mindset. If you try to view it as "a tip(anchor)" you haven't grasped it.
In case there's a basic misunderstanding, 2 tips means you fire your throw line through two crotches often nearly the same height, sometimes on adjacent leaders, though that's not always possible. A catch crotch or branch may be 4x the size of the tip crotch if you're in a 2" crotch higher up and it is your guarantee of not hitting the deck should statistics strike. That said I've only once dropped about 3' off a crap stub to a catch crotch during ascent. I knew a priori the stub was a non issue. I appreciate the peace of mind it gives.