southsoundtree
Been here much more than a while
- Location
- Olympia, WA
Curious if you've checked those numbers. You are posting from an opinion piece.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like that maga hat wearing fool who shot a native man who was protecting others in New Mexico recently. Damn dem’s allowing free speech in towns, they can’t even protect from the radical right. Twisted logic there BuckYou’re not paying attention. In every case above, the VAST majority of murders occur in democrat run cities. If you want to blame the 90% of Tennesseans who live peacefully in the suburbs or country for the huge number of murders committed in the ghettos of Nashville, Knoxville and Memphis, ok I guess?
You know better. Trust your gut.
View attachment 90520
Oh I’m paying attention, but I ain’t buying what your selling. The big cities scenario you are describing also happen in blue states, yet it Is the reds states that consistently have disproportionately high per capita murders rates. Why is that?You’re not paying attention. In every case above, the VAST majority of murders occur in democrat run cities. If you want to blame the 90% of Tennesseans who live peacefully in the suburbs or country for the huge number of murders committed in the ghettos of Nashville, Knoxville and Memphis, ok I guess?
You know better. Trust your gut.
View attachment 90520
Then why aren’t places like Vermont, Delaware, Rhode Island, and Maine experiencing high per capita murder rates comparable to those in Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, and South Carolina?Well gosh…. I guess the only possible answer is… Trump? Lol.
It’s because red states are much less populated than Cali or NY. Which dramatically bumps up “per capita” numbers.
I don't know who set up that challenges for PR on Social media but it is indeed pathetic .That seems more like the social media disease.
As Shadow said, this is a limited order in which Donald will no longer be allowed the harass, intimidate, attack, or threaten persons (witness, prosecutors, judges) involved in his DC case..No one else would have been allowed to say the things he has been saying concerning all of his various court cases, so why should it be any different for Donny Dearest? Lets remember that Donny is currently nothing more than someone running for public office. Does this make him so special that he alone should be allowed to break multiple pre-release agreements, and threaten and intimidate witnesses, prosecutors, and judges with impunity? This judge is simply doing her job and making sure that this trial is fair, and fair swings both ways my friend.Interesting times. Enforcing a “no speech” rule against a leading candidate for President is certainly a new tactic. Imagine the logistical (and political) nightmare that would ensue if she actually tried to enforce this and jail him. Although from all available evidence she seems the type.
I do wonder, having not read the actual gag order, what the specific limitations are. Could trump simply issue statements/tweets through a “spokesman” as a workaround?