trump and his bizarre relationship with the military. Free link
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What prior post are you referring to because I just searched through the last 10 pages and can find no post directed at me in which you ask "how was that mob going to change anything meaningful. Nothing?
On a serious note, you seem to be imagining things, making stuff up, or simply loosing your shit..Either way you might want to seek some professional help.
True statements but which miss the point. The point is tRump is a complete nut and fully caused the riot to happen...
Of course it was allowed to happen. Initially there was no legal reason to stop it. If it had remained peaceful, it was perfectly legal to assemble, just like the protests in LA were completely legal until some bad actors started looting and torched some cars, threw rocks, etc. But you still seem to be OK with the fact that the entire 6th January thing was egged on and basically caused by Trump with his 'Stop the Steal' lie and his insistence that Pence help overturn a legitimate election. This was basic textbook insurrection and if the spineless GOP were not terrified of his fanatic base with their death threats, he would never have been allowed to run again.I do not agree @cory. The riot could only have happened because it was allowed to happen. The crowds mood and movements were open and obvious. Do you really believe that the White House couldn't have protected itself from an unarmed crowd given the time it had to prepare?
Thus intent?The crowds mood and movements were open and obvious.
How was this allowed?The riot could only have happened because it was allowed to happen.
LOL, the irony of that song passed right over Taco's head. Just watched a bunch of the footage of it all. Pretty lame, considering how tRump was hyping it up. Best part was the historic uniforms from various periods. But most of the troops in modern dress looked less than happy to be there, and were just ambling along with no attempt to be in step or look smart at all. Here is what a parade looks like when troops are really proud of what they are doing. Notice towards the end, even the horses themselves are almost in step:The perfect song played by the Army Band at the rrviewing table for the No Kings Parade. Cadet Bonespurs is there...asleep
![]()
Timothy Burke (@bubbaprog.xyz)
I did not edit this, this is the actual parade with the actual music being played. CINEMATIC [contains quote post or other embedded content]bsky.app
Intent becomes legal hyperbole when there is zero possibility of achieving that intent. As in tree risk assessment, no target no risk.Thus intent?
This event was not a surprise and in fact, had vast amounts of legitimate warnings, when combined, to have had additional security on hand. It was available, but not requested, why?was this allowed?
www.justsecurity.org
... A small edit: it was not the White House that was attacked and you must have forgotten that not everyone in that crowd was unarmed. There were all sorts of clubs, pepper spray, flag poles, etc. used as weapons, with tons of footage to prove it, and there were certainly various Proud Boys and such who were armed with more serious stuff (which thank goodness they did not have the guts to use).
We will take this as an admission that you never actually asked the question you claim to have asked in post #8134. Carry on with your word salad..It was this post from the previous page, post 8,121. I didn't think it would be necessary to spell out the entire question. Intent, can not change anything, it takes actions.
"And anyone with half a brain understands that the intent that day was to stop the certification of the 2020 election."
"Yeah? How?"
Can you explain in clear terms, without the word salad Rico aludes to, why you think Trump bears no responsibility for what happened on Jan6 and why you don't believe the intent of the rioters that day was to stop the certification of the election? Your path to the 'truth' seems rather curious. There is endless video of Trump going on and on about non-existent massive nation-wide voter fraud, the election being stolen from him, and the need to fight, fight, fight. There is clear video of his speech tellng them to march on the capitol that day to 'stop the steal'. There is video and testimony from his own staff of him calmly watching the violence on TV, completely unconcerned to do anything to stop it, violence easily as dramatic as that happening in LA that he is suddenly so concerned over. This is violence which included tens of thousands of dollars damage to one of the most important buiildings in our democracy, a woman being shot to death in its defence, dozens of police officers critically injured, the vice president's life threatened, etc. Can you enlighten us as to what we are missing here?I do not agree @cory. The riot could only have happened because it was allowed to happen. The crowds mood and movements were open and obvious. Do you really believe that the White House couldn't have protected itself from an unarmed crowd given the time it had to prepare?
Might want to give some thought to bifocals old-timer.We will take this as an admission that you never actually asked the question you claim to have asked in post #8134. Carry on with your word salad..
The concept of intelligent people who are tRump supporters is a curious one, I can't figure it out.
And somehow this comes to mind
What I mean is, we can't loose sight of the fact that Trump himself is not actually the problem. He is simply a trigger for a problem that already existed. A shamefully large chunk of this nation's population is just like him, uneducated, selfish, and bigoted. He totally resonates with them, even to the extent of outright hero worship, as a shining example of success and power, as someone like them who finally came along to represents their interests. One of the best quotes I have seen lately:
"Trump is a poor person's idea of a rich man, a weak person's idea of a strong man, and a stupid person's idea of a smart man."
(from Cory: The concept of intelligent people who are tRump supporters is a curious one, I can't figure it out.)That is an amazingly arrogant perspective, Cory. Not something I associate with your normal thoughtful posts.
Intelligent people are some of the dumbest fools I’ve ever come across.(from Cory: The concept of intelligent people who are tRump supporters is a curious one, I can't figure it out.)
Why do you find it arrogant for Cory to express his honest puzzling over this? Of course, what Cory has overlooked is that, just because a person is intelligent, does not mean that person is not racist to some degree, nationalistic and isolationist in sentiment, self-serving, and possibly even a total hypocrite and arsehole. The GOP is full of such people and there are even occasional Democrats. In general American politics does not encourage or reward the positive virtues.