OK I'll bite.
Me tinks this pic is a fraud. The ladder rope and roofline in the backround would indicate this is the top of an extension ladder. That stub is definately 10+ feet up. Look at the camera angle. This pic was not taken from the ground. How much sense does that make?
I already mentioned the sun/shadow thing. "Fuzzy shadow" on the log is a good observation, and doesn't resonate with the clear lines of underarm shadow.
Next look at the stub. That's a pretty clean cut for a homeowner. Did he undercut it? Usually branches kick back far enough to knock out a ladder when they rip (haven't been undercut).There is a small rip around 7-8 o'clock, which could be consistent with the limb having been lowerred and the picture taken from a second floor window.
Next: What are the odds of the falling man , the chainsaw and the limb that knocked the ladder off, all being framed so nicely. Seems that the man should have been the last to go and it is unlikely that he could have caught up with the same branch that took out the ladder. And what are the odds that the saw ends up at that angle, like it was sitting on the ground.
Lastly the fact that it was published in a newspsper makes me that much more suspicious.
Any Wisonsonians have more fact?
Daniel