bonner1040
Branched out member
- Location
- Boston
I'm not sure that's correct - the ATF in the US certainly doesn't. They've written several letters to this effect:
The Bureau has previously examined devices known as 'Spud Guns, Potato Guns, or Spudzookas' and have determined that such devices, in and of themselves, are not firearms ... However, any similar devices which can be determined to be weapons by reason of their design construction, intended use, actual use, ammunition or other factors may meet the definition of a firearm
26 U.S. Code § 5845 explicitly mentions line throwing devices:
The term “destructive device” shall not include any device which is neither designed nor redesigned for use as a weapon; any device, although originally designed for use as a weapon, which is redesigned for use as a signaling, pyrotechnic, line throwing, safety, or similar device
Some states and municipalities may ban launchers based on the flammability of the propellant, but most don't. Most people reading this can legally use Aquanet and a sketchy PVC launcher to get a throwline into a tree if it suits them.
I'm a bit disappointed by the tone of most of this thread. The 'Buzz is usually pretty chill about acknowledging that there are many ways to do things, and that different things work for different people.* There are a lot of other forums where you can find all sorts of attitude about The Right Way to do things, I don't think many people look for that here.
* (I use a DIY pneumatic launcher made out of 1" galvanized pipe, with an elastic-actuated ball valve. It weighs like 50 pounds too many, requires custom throw-bags, and its power is on the verge of being underwhelming. But - it was cheap, and works for me! )
I'm no expert but I read that ATF letter from 1995 a little differently I guess. Either way my point that the APTA is safe and legal remains.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk