CMI ProKnot Usage?

Anyone know what this is used for?

http://www.cmi-gear.com/catalog/rigplates/proknot.asp

292952-ProKnot.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 292952-ProKnot.webp
    292952-ProKnot.webp
    37.2 KB · Views: 102
[ QUOTE ]
Isn't it supposed to replace a running bowline in light rigging situations?

[/ QUOTE ]

Dunno. I've never seen this thing.

Have you seen it out in the field?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Isn't it supposed to replace a running bowline in light rigging situations?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nailed it.

I don't know why anyone would do this. I can't see a single advantage.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
When it snags up to the branch there is no way to release the cam(s).

[/ QUOTE ]

A knife/saw would work!

[/ QUOTE ]
What???? How much for taking that tree down? $ 6000.00?

Sure ma'am we need 30 150 feet ropes to get the anchor point in it's place.
grin.gif
grin.gif
grin.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
A toothed ascender for use in "light rigging." Wow.

You won't find it listed at SherrillTree.com

[/ QUOTE ]

At least not until they send you that big check in the mail to say how great it is right Tobe?

It made to mimic knotless rigging minus the spliced ends and hardware. Can't say I've used one. Also can't say I wouldn't be willing to try one either as long as I don't have to pay 125$ just to be the beta tester (ie Kask helmets first generation)
 
Funny Marc ...but no, it's not about money, anymore so than my hours invested in your safety attending ANSI meetings and the like. It's also the reason Sherrill doesn't sell a number of other items I don't feel are sensible, such as ......a certain steel throw weight shaped like a torpedo being so actively promoted elsewhere.

Flushcut,
It's less a matter of the ascender getting smashed than what's going to happen to sheathed ropes (double braids, etc.) when that "toothed cam" locks on line tethering a XXX-pound log in motion. I've personally viewed the ripping that results on our 50-ton break machine (not with the ProKnot mind you). I think CMI initially built this by special request for an arborist in the area and then decided to market it. They say that several samples have been issued and that they've had no complaints.

I say if you can't tie or learn to tie a running bowline, you should find another line of work.
 
A number of years ago ISC made a prototype double headed non-handled ascender. It was developed to take the place of friction hitches for DdRT ascent. The ISC version used a cam like they use in their rope grabs. The cam did not have the sharp teeth.

The prototype was never made with the intention of using it for rigging like this CMI device.

I sure wouldn't like to see it being used for any sort of rigging either.
 
It's not supposed to be about knowing how to tie knots, it's supposed to be about the efficiency of not having to tie/untie knots (supposedly it's faster with knotless rigging then with traditional knots. I can't say for sure because I've never used a knotless rig for more than a few trees here and there)

It absolutly seems sketchy but again I'd be interested to try it (for free of course)

CMI really should just make a video of it being destroyed, with proper documentation of course. I'm sure DMM impact block would have caught some slack for the hollow spindle had they not made a sweet video of them attempting to break it.

At least it's made by CMI who stands behind their products with a lifetime warranty and it's not by some boojii a$$ Italian manufacturer that can't handle simple warehousing tasks let alone make quality gear.

But man are they good at cutting checks to all the wrong people
 
[ QUOTE ]

Flushcut,
It's less a matter of the ascender getting smashed than what's going to happen to sheathed ropes (double braids, etc.) when that "toothed cam" locks on line tethering a XXX-pound log in motion. I've personally viewed the ripping that results on our 50-ton break machine (not with the ProKnot mind you). I think CMI initially built this by special request for an arborist in the area and then decided to market it. They say that several samples have been issued and that they've had no complaints.

I say if you can't tie or learn to tie a running bowline, you should find another line of work.

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think that device is a good idea for any kind of rigging because you know some guy out there is going to "push it". I have seen a sheath get ripped on a job, and that was after a very short tumble of a climber and not 500lbs. Like you have said if you can't tie a running bowline you should not be in the industry. I like my knots and go knotless where possible but now adding a mechanical device into the mix, no thanks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
way to early for aprils fool ;-)

.....looks like a toy that ends up somewhere and not to be used ever after ....

climb safe - keep it simple

[/ QUOTE ]

laughabove.gif
I agree.
 
[ QUOTE ]
It's not supposed to be about knowing how to tie knots, it's supposed to be about the efficiency of not having to tie/untie knots ...

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't get me wrong, there exists no bigger fan of efficiency, I just don't think effectiveness outweighs risk in this particular solution.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom