Re: Buckingham \'GLIDE\'
glide vrs. lighter saddles
I picked up a couple of glides at TCIA so I could try it out myself and let my helpers try it out as well.
the buckingham Glide IS a heavier saddle.
When you compare it to my Butterfly or my Austrian Duo it is bulky.
BUT
I think the lighter saddles have a place for pruning, lighter work, competing. When I am swinging around a 046 (460 now) or bigger saw the lighter saddles dont support the weight as well. The back support will flex or the saddle will "walk" around my waist until the front is to the side.
the new Glide is stiffer, but seems to be along the same lines as the butterfly in it's design with a major difference: All the pieces are removable. so you could put different, softer leg straps from say your Butterfly on should you wish.
One note: Sherrills has the Glide put together wrong, In my opinion.
the leg strap buckels should be at the outside of the leg, NOT the inside where all my most important stuff could get pinched. I talked to the guy who made the Glide from Buckingham and he agreed about the buckle placement.
In addition, the side "D" rings can be made to lock back and forth by threading the bridge strap through the second bar of the "D". Just like the Butterflys.
There was some talk about the buckles on the Glide releasing, (this was from a different saddle maker) so I carried the Glide over to him and we compared the two saddles and worked the buckels. No difference at all between the two.
the only real difference in the buckle design I dont like is the size of the Glide buckles is so much bigger than the Butterflys.
I have been climbing with the Glide now for a few days and like it alot.
Oh and the pulley seems a little silly, maybe the upgraded pulley from CMI will be better dont know
Frans