chris_girard
Branched out member
- Location
- Gilmanton, N.H.
[ QUOTE ]
Of course I realize the problem with averages. Half the people I know are below average!
I have always found it useful when estimating foliage to take the lenght of the branch and calculate based on its greatest diameter. For instance a 40' limb that is 20" in diameter at its greatest would be calculated as a log 40'x20". I am usually within a 200lb. No scientific, not fullproof, but a start.
Tony
[/ QUOTE ]
LOL, Tony. Yeah, even though some people may be "below average", I have found them to be a valuable resource at times. Sometimes the cleverest guys don’t have much of an education, but have a world of experience and I try to listen to them (as I’m sure you do).
On the other hand, I have a college degree in engineering and sometimes it seems like MORE than half the engineers that I know are below average as well, at least in the common sense department.
Thanks for the tips on the foliage weights, I’ll have to give that some thought and see how it works out.
Of course I realize the problem with averages. Half the people I know are below average!
I have always found it useful when estimating foliage to take the lenght of the branch and calculate based on its greatest diameter. For instance a 40' limb that is 20" in diameter at its greatest would be calculated as a log 40'x20". I am usually within a 200lb. No scientific, not fullproof, but a start.
Tony
[/ QUOTE ]
LOL, Tony. Yeah, even though some people may be "below average", I have found them to be a valuable resource at times. Sometimes the cleverest guys don’t have much of an education, but have a world of experience and I try to listen to them (as I’m sure you do).
On the other hand, I have a college degree in engineering and sometimes it seems like MORE than half the engineers that I know are below average as well, at least in the common sense department.
Thanks for the tips on the foliage weights, I’ll have to give that some thought and see how it works out.