The first sentence makes no sense.. truck wasn't designed to pull on a rope??? gear ratio all wrong???? complete nonsense.. This another perfect example of the total BS that anyone can spew out online... these are my critics??? calling pulling with a pickup "crude" and "a recipe for disaster"... Is there anyone else here that objects to using pickups to pull trees? I'll use the bucket truck or the chip truck when I need the extra weight... In the countless times I've used trucks and equipment to fall tree and throw tops, their use has been a recipe for success... But this is the bull shit and level of discourse that happens here at the buzz.. So ridiculous it's not even worth responding to.
Your second sentence on the other hand makes a valid point and is worth discussing... It sounds logical... one would think that's true.. but you would have had to see the tree.. when it comes to a climber going 100' up a rotted tulip that looks like it's ready to go any minute, logic goes out the window. I've been around a lot of tree climbers over the last 40 years, and fortunately some of the best that have ever walked the planet... Not too many of them would have gone up this tree.
But some might have and honestly once we strapped it and as long as everything was getting bombed you would think it was climbable. On the other hand, it took a lot of force with the pull line to get it free from the other tree. I was concerned that it cold fail just by pulling that hard against the lean. If I was running the job, I wouldn't have allowed a climber to go up that tree. You're better off walking away. Letting a crane do the job. SO academically yes, a climber could have climbed that tree, but practically.. NFW... nobody was going to climb that tree and no boss in his right mind would have allowed it.