[ QUOTE ]
Lets see whats a better value?
A 550 dollar 200t that can last 5 years or longer.
or
A 400 dollar 338 that will hardly make it past a year.
and FWIW Rog, you dont get my goat by saying 338s are better. I know the opposite to be true. If anything, Im getting your goat by saying the 200t is superior. And I would be totally correct in saying so. Just ask me.
[/ QUOTE ]Overall, the 200T is the better saw....barely. But it's heavier, costs $200 more, and it isn't shaped as well for pulling up through the canopy. Handle, carb, switch, connecting rods, etc a pain to repair, and prone to failure. Jug and bottom end are bombproof on the Husky's. Never had one go bad, save for bearings on one.
I've stuck with the Huskys for 12 years now. I've had one or two that would outcut the 200, stock for stock. Most won't. My best 335, I got for $40, in a box, in pieces. Put it together, modded the muffler, it was faster than my latest new edition 2139, I think, and was dead on reliable for nearly 3 years. The jug is still in good shape but the bearings are toast, prolly from it having so much power. It would beat a 200 by ~20%.
Time will tell if the new NE models will stay dead on reliable for more than a couple years. Some of my 335's that were made about yr 2000 ran for a good while before developing the idling/starting issues that the saws are infamous for.