2 Canadian, Ottawa-Gatineau tornados, ef2, ef3

Redtree

Participating member
Location
Mt. Albert
it happened friday the 21st. Anyone have any work pics or tree damage pics to post? otherwise its worth a YouTube search. I imagine there will be a lot of trees removed which are badly damaged but have complete potential to become good trees again in time. knee jerk reaction to cut down damaged trees.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 
Not the greatest pictures but most of these are from the tornado that hit the Dunrobin area which is rural. It was awful, many folks lost everything.

The tornadoes that hit the city completely wiped out all the trees in certain neighborhoods. Neighborhoods that were know for their big old trees. Very sad, we're not used to extreme weather like this. It was a bit of an eye opener.
 
It's very sad to see the tree damage. I heard some people in Arlington Woods are mourning the loss of the trees. Particularly the old White Pines. I just can't believe there were no human casualties. Is that accurate? Very lucky. And how is it going with the post storm attitude? Is there a good balance of cut it vs retain it. Or as they learned from the 1998 ice, play more 'wait and see' than 'remove the risk'. I'm sure efforts are going into clearing loose debris vs cutting down, but that may be changing by now. And lots are certainly cherishing what they have left, requesting preservation. But it scares me to think what advice may be given or what assumptions may be made (not that good advice isn't also being given a lot as well). That looks like a Silver Maple?. Not the best tree now but still the best tree in that spot. Not that its my job or a tree Im standing in front of but maybe they could wait and see, then do what makes sense after you see a year or two of the tree's response. After all, it's almost certainly 'safer' than any tree that didn't just go through a tornado. What's remaining is good to 200km (120mph) wind or so. At least for a couple years.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 
:cachetada:you need to rethink compromised trees and never turn your back on storm damage.
it will bite you. nothings safe if it has been extremely loaded/hiddenfractures and defects.
 
:cachetada:you need to rethink compromised trees and never turn your back on storm damage.
it will bite you. nothings safe if it has been extremely loaded/hiddenfractures and defects.
Even trees that aren't storm damaged at all will bite you. Yes there may be fractures in the remaining trees and thats why I said "almost certainly". Thats why you get up there maybe even with a small chainsaw which is only a pruning tool 1 percent of the time. Then you release hangers and address fractures. What is left is not stronger but more capable than before, as vulnerabilities have been blown off. Its Mother Nature's crown reduction. Take 20 minutes and finish it. Then monitor two years later after response. I'm not saying to retain it forever, maybe just long enough to shelter and establish the newly planted trees that may go in. Its a a matter of being progressive and considerate of all things. Avoid a knee-jerk reaction. Risk will grow back in time, and decay can be monitored. The tree will never be ideal and will ideally require monitoring every 2-3 years. The other option is removal leaving a huge empty space. Low risk must be balanced with the great benefits of the tree otherwise. And remember even a tree with high risk is very very unlikely to hurt someone. Not that it doesn't happen. and when it happens its firstly a lack of monitoring high traffic areas and secondly a matter of high risk trees. Damaged trees near high traffic areas require monitoring, which is still cheaper than removal and replanting. So removing trees with the potential or even a chance of recovery is often more expensive and short sighted. Depending on targets its even possible to retain the damaged white pine. Cutting a few down is necessary for sure, but cutting to "clean up" can be a huge loss of value and increase in cost. I dont turn my back, I open my toolbox.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 
I can imagine. The trees that are easily felled will be targets and labeled 'dangerous' just to sell the job. hopefully some of the homeowners will be aware of the fact that they need a conservative arborists opinion. A few of those wolves are likely arborists who make it hard for the homeowners to know. Some of them want the money and some just lack the experience and ability to consult effectively.

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom