you again?
im not bothered, it all pays the same. its a interesting defense though, you guys talk shit for months and when I share my thoughts I am met with dude let it go?
I will admit this part is my least favorite part, its kinda like Dog crap in the Yard. you can have a great...
I cannot copy something that is infringing on my patent. that just does not make sense. imagine you were in my shoes. anyway using webbing was the only way to incorporate the pulley at the bottom. I was working on the Velox before he made the copy. it takes time and money to make things...
its a verbal you have heard several times??? verbal??? as in person? really?? so when did this happen? or are you just making S*$T up to sound like an much smarter authority? or are you making stuff up so I sound stupid? because that would be slander. I don't have time to baby sit this...
I mean this, I really hope you have something here, 1/16th is probably more realistic but that could still be conservatively 600k a year for 17 years plus or minus depending where its applicable. not a bad take. I want nothing to do with your product, but if you think I could be of help...
no need to heck, its hurtful, unproductive and just not nice.
lets change up your scenario a bit make it a bit more interesting, again totally hypothetical. ,
what if some guy had a idea invented and patented a idea, and he did so way before a second guy saw the idea ? then what if...
if you are actually interested in the answer to that I can help a bit. the ansewer is no. for multiple reasons. the biggest its publically owned. you cannot take something from the public and patent it. the second reason is I don't think it is a patentable concept, this is where you...
this is how nearly all patent things go from what I understand, its not really complicated like that. nore that dirty, I know my experience was not.
you have a idea, you test it, then you look to see if anyone else ever did it or are doing it so you don't waste your time and money. if you...
. actually its a funny story.
So I made the haas and it it was working well but not good enough, I wanted to make it better. I knew as soon as guys forgot how bad body thrusting up a tree was they would realize that the haas was not perfect in operation, way better than any other option...
My question to the industry is this, was it more beneficial to the industry that I did what I did or would the industry have been more greatly benefited had I tried to reinvent another piece of kit, say for giggles the mag bag?
Furthermore, patent law is way more complicated and intertwined...
congrats to luke and Sherrill
. Sherrill is a good company. as is trees tuff.
if you guys are talking about me, which I really hope your not,first please don't hijack such a important thread if you must do this start a new thread.., but second please do all of us a favor and back up...
that is interesting, i guess i just thought if Ohio was open carry, than texas must have been. there was talk of ohio going to open carry, or rather dealing with the inciting panic thing which would make it less troublesome to carry open. but I hope it never does.
that is a neat...
I think it was always a open carry state, many are, but there was another law not he books that said said you could not incite a panic, ohio is like this. we are a open carry state but you cannot incite a panic. so if someone does not like you gun all they need to do is freak out and get...
that is insane. stupid and if those morons got shot by the police I would hope the police would not be held responsible . i am actually interested in what they thought they were actually doing..
this is not the same as CCW.
this is a real issue. people who carry and don't realize that cannot go in places.. we had a ring in ohio that was waiting outside places where no carry signs were posted.. people would walk up to the do get all bent out of shape stomp back to their care where where made a display of...