[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Mark, can you explain how that pic could possible happen? I can see cross loading it with a sling or splice pulling against the gate, in doing so depressing the magnets, but as soon as the weight is removed the magnets would lock. How would you cross load a biner like your pick without it flipping over first. Again I'm not being critical just like to know.
I think if you spend enough time you can figure out a way to make any thing fail. I've unlocked a petzl OK by accidentally running a munter over the gate. That doesn't mean there is any thing wrong with it you just have to pay attention to what your doing.
[/ QUOTE ]
That was a very good post! I have been sitting here thinking the exact same thoughts. All things can be made to fail, if you try hard enough.
Is it really too much to ask that the professionals using these tools, use them in an appropriate manner?
David
[/ QUOTE ]
Although that is a very important discussion, its a much wider one isnt it?
@ Magnetron: Beside the "accidential-opening-thing" of the gate (which I am convinced not to be a problem on the Magnetron, unlike the Passo PL) my biggest concern was the gate face strength.
There is nothing in front of the nose to support it when loaded from the outside and that looks weird or at least I am very unused to that. (Thinking back to old AMB Ball Locks with sprung plastic gates...)
After talking to teh designer I am fine with that as well, as the gate face strength is 4kN, 2 kN for each button.
Thats very close to the "high-end" carabiners and much better then most other ones (incl other BD carabiners...

and I bet way better the the Skylotec also.
The Passo PL has the problem that the springs for the buttons are quite weak, they have to be to close the gate mechanism. I dont know the gate face strenght of it to be honest but I dont really care as I dont have any...