ward
Participating member
- Location
- Unincorporated Clackamas, OR
Thank you for spelling it out so well. So, in your mind, it is entirely fair and honest to build some cushion into the crane cost because the most important thing is the objective achieved. That deserves some consideration. I like that a lot. It means you could possibly bill the client either way, depending upon what you learned about what is valuable for the client. If they want the surety of a fixed cost, bid the crane out this way; if they are wanting transparency, bid the crane portion in a variable way. The main thing is achieving the objective as the client understands it. I'm starting to see the light of how that could be okay to do--either way might make sense. Seeing the light of that now.Right, where it shows up in the quote is not the point but that it's calculated into the cost.
As for the dialog, this is a great example of why one qualifies their client up front instead of after the quote is tendered. It's part of the selling strategy. Ask the questions up front to learn what your client values and then adjust your proposal to their values.
If the conversation does come up about the difference between the variable cost quote and the fixed cost you can relate it to their stated value.
For one thing, that's a pretty savvy customer. Which is fine. You would know this upfront if you've qualified them. Instead of the closed, albeit polite, answer you posit here, a more open ended response would be better;
"When we first discussed this project we agreed that you didn't like surprises and wanted to know what you needed to budget for the removal of your tree. I've taken into account all aspects of the crane costs based on my extensive experience. I'm confident the number is accurate. There will be no surprise additional costs for you. Does that meet with your expectations?"
It's a competitive process. The client could still decide to go with the variable cost and role the dice thinking that maybe it'll be cheaper. That's really up to them and whether at the end of the day, price is king. Hopefully there are other qualifying values that they apply to determine who they'll choose.
Whether there's a crane involved or not, the value of the work is in the customer's eyes not purely in the numbers charged. We've done jobs where the price reflected a longer day or more crew members being on the job only to have it done in half the time and with fewer people because we saw an approach that the salesperson didn't. It's inconsequential to the value of the work. That was established by the price in relationship to the objectives of the work, not in the number of hours, equipment used, or number of crew on the job.
In other words, we don't need to roll out the "machine that goes, bing!" to make the customer feel they got their money's worth.
I will admit that fixing the cost does eliminate some of the ugly boilerplate, because you don't have to cross the hurdle of explaining all of the costs of the crane to the client. You keep those costs as a part of the bid.
I don't how you prequalify clients as to which way to bid the crane cost. You can't just ask them if they prefer the certainty of a fixed number or the transparency of a variable cost. They will want both the certainty of the fixed number, but the knowledge of the variable cost with the option to accept the lesser cost, should that be possible.
At the end of the day, darnit, maybe trust in ourselves alone and just guarantee the job for a fixed cost, without the burden of being transparent about it. Simple.
Last edited: