- Location
- Basel, Switzerland
Guys,
this is getting ridiculous. It's a bit like saying "I hear treeMOTION is responsible for global warming". Let's keep this in perspective.
FlashTreetop,
try reading Chris' whole post and you will find – towards the end – the solution:
[ QUOTE ]
Hutch, you asked about 'replacement parts'. In the next few weeks, the adjustable link in the upper webbing slot of the Front D hardware will be a replaceable part. Both leg loops will be replaceable too. In effect, because the bridge can also be renewed, the whole of the front of the harness will be end-user-replaceable.
Chris
[/ QUOTE ]
There are two approaches towards achieving longevity, the first it to go heavyweight. Lots of material will mean – amongst other things – higher tolerance towards abrasion.
Higher tolerance doesn't mean there zero abrasion, mind you. The down-side? More weight (duh), the webbing doesn't run as smoothly through the hardware etc.
The other approach is to go lightweight. Besides the treeMOTION, Petzl took this approach with the Sequoia, or Edelrid with the TreeMagic. If you take this route, you're not compromising on safety, but wear can be more apparent. Instead of incorporating lots of material to counter this, you offer replacement parts.
Like brake pads on a bike. When they wear down, you get new ones to replace the old ones. You could also make huge brake pads that won't need replacing in the lifetime of the bike. But that wouldn't make sense, because you replace worn parts. Does that mean the whole brake is dangerous? Of course not!
When you wear out a friction hitch cord you replace it. You don't use a one inch line to get a longer life out of the cord...
Both routes have their merits and validity, in the end it's up to the end-user to make the choice.
Please try not to oversimplify the matter.
If you don't like to route we took – and the philosophy behind it, well there's good news: You don't have to buy the harness.
Regards, Mark.
this is getting ridiculous. It's a bit like saying "I hear treeMOTION is responsible for global warming". Let's keep this in perspective.
FlashTreetop,
try reading Chris' whole post and you will find – towards the end – the solution:
[ QUOTE ]
Hutch, you asked about 'replacement parts'. In the next few weeks, the adjustable link in the upper webbing slot of the Front D hardware will be a replaceable part. Both leg loops will be replaceable too. In effect, because the bridge can also be renewed, the whole of the front of the harness will be end-user-replaceable.
Chris
[/ QUOTE ]
There are two approaches towards achieving longevity, the first it to go heavyweight. Lots of material will mean – amongst other things – higher tolerance towards abrasion.
Higher tolerance doesn't mean there zero abrasion, mind you. The down-side? More weight (duh), the webbing doesn't run as smoothly through the hardware etc.
The other approach is to go lightweight. Besides the treeMOTION, Petzl took this approach with the Sequoia, or Edelrid with the TreeMagic. If you take this route, you're not compromising on safety, but wear can be more apparent. Instead of incorporating lots of material to counter this, you offer replacement parts.
Like brake pads on a bike. When they wear down, you get new ones to replace the old ones. You could also make huge brake pads that won't need replacing in the lifetime of the bike. But that wouldn't make sense, because you replace worn parts. Does that mean the whole brake is dangerous? Of course not!
When you wear out a friction hitch cord you replace it. You don't use a one inch line to get a longer life out of the cord...
Both routes have their merits and validity, in the end it's up to the end-user to make the choice.
Please try not to oversimplify the matter.
If you don't like to route we took – and the philosophy behind it, well there's good news: You don't have to buy the harness.
Regards, Mark.










