Torn by spikes....Geckos vs. T2s

NickfromWI

Participating member
Location
Los Angeles, CA
Friday I received a recent purchase from sherrill. My first pair of spikes I've ever owned. I bought 2 of them, to try them both and see which I prefer. I got the aluminum Geckos and the Titanium T2's from Buckingmam. I put the velcro wrap pad on the T2s. Here's the break down.

WEIGHT: Thought Titanium, by the time you put the pads and straps on, the pair of T2s ended up weighing 2 pounds more than the Geckos. Official weights according to my dgital scale: Geckos: 2 lbs, 3oz. T2s: 3 lbs, 4oz. (this is for ONE spike, not the pair)

TOP STRAP: The T2s had a good doubled-back cinch down velcro strap, whereas the Geckos have just a plain once-around velcro strap. I was certain the T2s would be way better, but as far as security/snugness, it was about a tie. A coworker today pointed out that the buckinghams (T2s) are more prevalant today. If needed replacement parts for either of the spikes, I'd have to order for the Geckos, whereas the T2s I could surely go to a local store for parts, and certainly just take some off the many pair of old spikes lying around the shop. It's a good point to keep in mind.

BOTTOM STRAPS: The bottom straps were of the same design, the T2s with Buckinghams strap, and the Geckos with weaver. There is a large flat piece of leather on each of them that lays down on the top of the boot. The weaver one kepts getting sucked into the buckle when I was tightening it. It was annoying. Otherwise, the 2 lower straps were identical.

OVERALL COMFORT: The Geckos win this category by a super, super long shot. Soft foam conforms to your leg/shin. I did what I called the ten minute test, where I stood in one spot, barely shifting my weight and never lifting my spikes for, you guessed it, TEN MINUTES each! I noticed a LOT less pressure points in the Geckos than in the T2s. I'm sure this is due to the Geckos' combination of fiberglass/foam. I felt some definate pain on the upper inside of my shin when wearing the T2s. Granted, ten minutes in ONE spot is a LONG time when you're in a tree...I thought it was worth trying the 10 minute test none the less.

GAFFS: The actual spikes on each of these are quite different. The length is more of less the same, but there are other major differences. The first, and most obvious is that the T2 spikes are more or less straight whereas the Geckos have a slight "s" curve to them. So that's one. Other is the angle. The T2 spike point straight down more, creating a 30* angle with the shaft, while the Gecko points out more, about a 60* angle. BUTTTTTT remember that the Gecko spike has that curve to it, so the part that actually sticks into the tree, the last inch of it curves down, making the angle of that last inch similar (though still not and sharp of an angle) as the T2s. Both spikes are replaceable, but not interchangable (you can't put a Gecko spike on the T2's).....I think.

USE: Like I've already stated, the Gecko's were better to have on, but once I started climbing, it seemed the T2s are the way to go. I climbed 2 trees, a dead (almost) Sycamore, and a super smooth trunked Palm (I think it was a Mexican Fan Palm...I'm still learning them). In both trees, I only gaffed out once or twice in the T2's (keep in mind that I was not going slow, and I haven't had spikes on for like a full year, and have less than 10 hours of total spike experience in my life). When I put the Geckos on, I gaffed out several times. I didn't count, but I should've. It happened enough that it quickly made me think maybe the Geckos AREN't the ones to get.
Other than the gaffing out, I noticed the T2s allowed my feet (heels or toes) to get closer to the tree, probably due to the steep angle of the spike. I don't quite understand it because if you measure the distance of tip of spike to the frame, the gecko was actually closer by like a quarter inch or something like that. The T2's seemed to have a little play in them. Because the shaft is adjusted by sliding it up or down, you can feel that wobble a bit when you're climbing. It's really no big deal and doesn't affect the climbing, I just prefered the perceived sense of stability that you get with the Geckos lack of moving parts.

The point: Can anyone offer any tips? I have about $600 worth of spikes, and can't afford to keep them both. Anyone use the geckos that think I might get used to the shape of the spike...or should I stick with the heavier, but more secure T2's?

I just thought I'd put this thread in as a service to anyone looking to buy some spikes, and maybe y'all can help me out a bit, too!

love
nick
 
Dear Nick,
I have both of the spurs you mention.
The first Geckos I bought (alum.) were bought with the idea of cutting weight from my overall gear load. The Geckos did that. When the Alum. ones were recalled Sherrill replaced them with the Titanium ones. Imagine my surprise when I weighed them in my hands and noticed that they were really not all that lighter than my (other) steel ones!
Having said that, on closer inspection the shank on the Titanium spurs are the light part and the velcro pad and straps bring the overall weight up nearly to the normal weights of any spur.
Sooo, the Geckos still are truly the lightest weight spur on the market today. However the Geckos have that spur configuration you mentioned. Seemed to me that I also kicked out more with them than with the traditional ones. Someone mentioned here at TreeBuzz that this may be because after so many years of spurring that my feet are trained to the standard spur angle and the Gecko spurs hold your foot differently. Not better or worse just different. Hence the 'kicking out' syndrome with the Geckos.
With the small amount of time you log in with spurs, it would seem that you would want the lighter weight of the Geckos. But these spurs require a greater skill level to use because your toe and heel are farther away from the trunk. So balancing may be a greater issue for you, especially on smaller dia. trunks/stems.
You are also not that big of a guy so your body weight does not contribute to 'setting' the spur in the wood. That may contribute to the kicking out you noticed with the geckos. The T2s would be better for that.
On the other hand, you have experiance with rock climbing and moving your body while maintaining your center of balance. Finesse is usually the order of the day for lighter people so lighter gear is good for you so you can move freely while expending the least amount of effort.
My advice, is to figure out what size tree you mainly spur on and select the spur that will work best for all of those.
Or keep them both and switch them around according to the tree at hand. Maybe even wear one of each!
 
I've opted to try the wolf claw (through baileys) not because it was lighter but because it is a full frame with a diffent style of straps.

I worked with bashlin steel spurs before and found the pads just killed my shins.

the new wolfclaws are a whole lot more comfortable, you don't need to tighten the straps so much as to cut off circulation.

However, because they are different in design and use it is taking some getting used to.

Perhaps it is old technique for the old spurs that has me cutting out too often.

Then again, I remeber when I started with my first pair I was cutting out all the time.

Every time I use the new ones I cut out less frequently, and usually only when I slide back into my "old spur" ways.

When it comes to the thought of using different spurs for different trees I'd hesitate to do so. I really don't equate the differences in spurs as much as you would say between a PW or a Hobbs for takedowns.

Once you get used to a set of spurs they become and extension of your body. if you keep changing back and forth you might never develop a rhythm or technique.

Just my 2 cents worth...
 
[ QUOTE ]

Once you get used to a set of spurs they become and extension of your body. if you keep changing back and forth you might never develop a rhythm or technique.

Just my 2 cents worth...

[/ QUOTE ]

And a good 2 cents is was!

I think I 'got' my rhythm like what, 15 years ago now. After that many years of spurring up and down trees and each year trying out the latest gear, I now have a good idea of what works and what does not work for me.
So now I like to experiment.

Never have heard a good review of the wolfclaws until now tho. Tried them but did'nt like them at all.
Just my $10.00 dollars worth /forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif
Frans
 
[ QUOTE ]
The T2's seemed to have a little play in them. Because the shaft is adjusted by sliding it up or down, you can feel that wobble a bit when you're climbing. It's really no big deal and doesn't affect the climbing, I just prefered the perceived sense of stability that you get with the Geckos lack of moving parts.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sean at Wesspur was telling me that they have a new pad for the Bucks that is like the super climbers but has steel to support the shaft. He has used the std. super for years but isn't crazy about the wobble. Not in the catalog yet but p/n is 145AC. But maybe your wrap pads have that same steel support system?? Sounds like this isn't the source of your wobble. Just thought I'd mention it it case you needed something else to try.
 
Attached is a pic of the Wolf Claws.

I haven't heard anything either way about them. Id be curious as to what reviews you guys are referring to.

The biggest thing I hated about the standard spurs is the tendency of the shank to rotate, ever so slightly, around the vertical axis of my leg. Wore my shin-skin into open sores. Even with differnet pads.

Reason I went with the WC was because it is a full stirrup type harness less prone to twisting.

When I received mine there was a notice that there was a change or two to the frame itself using more metal in certain non-load-bearing areas to stiffen up the frame a bit.

I do have to admit that the part under the arch of the foot is taking a little getting used to. My old spurs never bothered my arch

While the new WC doesn't bother my arch I do notice it where as I hadn't noticed it with the others.

Another feature that takes a bit of thought is the positioning of the spur. You can set it so that the point protrudes below the arch step (so if you walk they poke into the dirt) They can be even with the arch step, or they can be set to be above the step.

I've settled on the middle position just because it is one less variable to contend with until I'm fully familiar with the spurs.

Hope this helps!
 

Attachments

  • 32653-WC-1001.webp
    32653-WC-1001.webp
    15.5 KB · Views: 156
[quote
Never have heard a good review of the wolfclaws until now tho. Tried them but did'nt like them at all.
Just my $10.00 dollars worth /forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif
Frans

[/ QUOTE ]

Just curious Frans, what was it you didn't like about the Wolfclaws?

As for the other negative reports you had heard, what were the most common complaints?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[quote
Never have heard a good review of the wolfclaws until now tho. Tried them but did'nt like them at all.
Just my $10.00 dollars worth /forum/images/graemlins/wink.gif
Frans

[/ QUOTE ]

Just curious Frans, what was it you didn't like about the Wolfclaws?


[/ QUOTE ]

I like to move while in the tree. The wolfclaws hold my ankle and leg too rigid. And they are bloody hot on a hot day. No thanks
Frans
 
[quote
I like to move while in the tree. The wolfclaws hold my ankle and leg too rigid. And they are bloody hot on a hot day. No thanks
Frans

[/ QUOTE ]

I can see the neoprene padding being exceptionally hot, so I'd have to agree with you on that one.

Then again, I'm a former firefighter, so weaing gear that makes you hot is something I'm used to.

I also wear long sleeves all year round to protect my arms. I guess I don't really think about my gear being too hot.

As for the rigidity, that is probably the number one reason why I like them. They keep me together and in place and they don't shift around my leg much at all.

I suppose, that as with anything, you gotta give some equipment more time than others to begin to develop a proper like or dislike. Every day I use the wolfclaws I get a better appreciation what they can and cannot do for me.

I know my first saddle sucked until I had worn it for a few weeks. Now I often wish I hadn't ever gotten rid of it.
 
Bought a pair of Wolfclaws last year as the bucs were killing my shins. The Wolfclaws are definitely easier on the shins and feet, but not as secure in my opinion as buckinghams. They have that big chunky gaff...tends to slip a little more. The guy I work with recently bought a pair of Geckos, and he is trying to get the feel for them, as he is slipping around more on them than he did with bucs, but reports they are extremely comfortable. He still wishes he had gone with the bucs, though, as they have the better bite.
 
[ QUOTE ]
They have that big chunky gaff...tends to slip a little more.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey Dan,

I was cutting out a bunch too, in the beginning, but my lead climber wasn't having as much of a problem.

Yes the gaffs are a WHOLE LOT beefier than other gaffs but my LC kept harping on me that all you have to (on softer barked trees) is "place" the gaff and set with a firm push. Takes a bit of technique but it does work.

As for the harder barked trees you still have to drive/kick the spurs in. But, again, technique is a little different than with regular spurs and your legs do learn it after a short while.

Now that we've played with them a while, we are happy with them.

They are certainly not anywhere near being perfect, but they work, and most important for me, I don't get the compression sores on my shins anymore. And anyone who has seen the blood on my pant legs after a day with regular spurs will understand my frustration... /forum/images/graemlins/frown.gif

That the WCs don't hurt me, if for no other reason, is worth going through the extra learning curve.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom