I take a lot of footage in both categories, some on job sites, some of others jobs sites, some of public, buildings, hacked trees etc.
Recently I was parked up correctly videoing another companies jobsite and the customer was going off, he grabbed the off duty cop next door to get rid of me. The cop and I had a chat whilst the camera was running and he couldn't do a thing about it. No law was being broken.
I also had a ranting security guard threaten me when I was taking pics of the hacked trees at some factory's front yard but I was on the road and he couldn't do a thing about it, I told him try harder to get into the police force coz everyone knows why they are security guards (either failed cops or failed to get in)... he got really pissed off with that.
It wouldn't be the first time I've had a ranting person demanding me stop or hand the camera over so it pays to know the law on a couple of sensitive issues.
1. You're rights to taking the pictures/video
2. Your rights to publishing it ... on the net lets say.
Now there may be some different laws across the continents so I've done a bit of research for USA and Australia.
Here's the link for the USA guys
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2005-12-29-camera-laws_x.htm
And here's a few links for the Australians, and an extract from the first link.
The publication of a person’s photograph without their consent is not in itself proof of defamation. The unauthorised use of the image would need to either lower the public’s estimation of the person, expose the person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or cause the person to be shunned or avoided.
http://www.artslaw.com.au/LegalInformation/UnauthorisedUseImage.asp
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/RN/2004-05/05rn37.pdf
http://www.overclockers.com.au/wiki/Your_right_to_take_photographs
So, for the above two countries you're pretty right to shoot away. There's a couple of things you need to watch and that's defamation and tort invasion of privacy ... also, if you are on private property in a private place ... like the customers place they do have the right to ask you to not take pics or vid and even have the right to remove you with reasonable force but not battery if you do not comply.
I think that first link for the USA guys covers it well. But I've been sitting here 3 hours now reading up on this and am most confident that I haven't stepped outside the law and can "snap" away.
But I suppose you gotta watch that defamation one if you have some footage of people doing the wrong thing and publish it ... could be messy. If you were embarking on a TV ad where you had some rough nuts carrying on doing the wrong thing you might want to make it a "staged" event with consenting people or actors coz heck ... if it was real footage you might find yourself in a defamation case ... especially if they lost a lot of business over it.
Recently I was parked up correctly videoing another companies jobsite and the customer was going off, he grabbed the off duty cop next door to get rid of me. The cop and I had a chat whilst the camera was running and he couldn't do a thing about it. No law was being broken.
I also had a ranting security guard threaten me when I was taking pics of the hacked trees at some factory's front yard but I was on the road and he couldn't do a thing about it, I told him try harder to get into the police force coz everyone knows why they are security guards (either failed cops or failed to get in)... he got really pissed off with that.
It wouldn't be the first time I've had a ranting person demanding me stop or hand the camera over so it pays to know the law on a couple of sensitive issues.
1. You're rights to taking the pictures/video
2. Your rights to publishing it ... on the net lets say.
Now there may be some different laws across the continents so I've done a bit of research for USA and Australia.
Here's the link for the USA guys
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/andrewkantor/2005-12-29-camera-laws_x.htm
And here's a few links for the Australians, and an extract from the first link.
The publication of a person’s photograph without their consent is not in itself proof of defamation. The unauthorised use of the image would need to either lower the public’s estimation of the person, expose the person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or cause the person to be shunned or avoided.
http://www.artslaw.com.au/LegalInformation/UnauthorisedUseImage.asp
http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/RN/2004-05/05rn37.pdf
http://www.overclockers.com.au/wiki/Your_right_to_take_photographs
So, for the above two countries you're pretty right to shoot away. There's a couple of things you need to watch and that's defamation and tort invasion of privacy ... also, if you are on private property in a private place ... like the customers place they do have the right to ask you to not take pics or vid and even have the right to remove you with reasonable force but not battery if you do not comply.
I think that first link for the USA guys covers it well. But I've been sitting here 3 hours now reading up on this and am most confident that I haven't stepped outside the law and can "snap" away.
But I suppose you gotta watch that defamation one if you have some footage of people doing the wrong thing and publish it ... could be messy. If you were embarking on a TV ad where you had some rough nuts carrying on doing the wrong thing you might want to make it a "staged" event with consenting people or actors coz heck ... if it was real footage you might find yourself in a defamation case ... especially if they lost a lot of business over it.