[ QUOTE ]
Thanks countryboy for posting that picture again... And getting a response from someone. I have posted it twice and didnt get a peep, about close calls or concerns from anyone.
This set up (with the petzl pulley) was used for one week trying to see how it worked and if it was worth pursuing. I then exchanged the petzl for a DMM pinto which is well inside the life support rating standards.
Bigwood, correct me if I am wrong your situation sounds like it occured due to the pully ending up on the spine and then being loaded causing an uneven load on the side plates, seperating them and allowing the axle to fall out?
In this TIP method the pulley is static, it does not move from the possition you install it at, because it cinches to the tree. I actually dont set this from the ground do to the fact of needing 3x the rope, I basil tie to get up in the tree and then advance to my final tie (because I rarely get my final tie with a thowline).
[/ QUOTE ]
Because most if not all biners have a radiused "basket", any load in that configuration is going to contribute to the side plates spreading. It just happened that my situation accelerated the process.
Regarding the tip method, I assume that if this is being set while at the TIP
Then a WR is being used. Therefore, although it is cinched to the tree, the angle if pull is constantly changing as one works the tree. There in lies the problem, the climbing line is almost always levering against the side plates.
Not to mention driving a chunk of alluminum into the cambium.
Finally the biner has no rating used this way, so you're really just guessing at its Swl at this point.