[ QUOTE ]
I think that there is 2 slings being used in the picture.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, the photo shows 2 chokers.
[ QUOTE ]
I, personally, don't care for overhead lifting with a non locking gated hook. It might be faster, but I go for safer.
[/ QUOTE ]
Norm. I understand. When I was introduced to them, I wasn't comfortable either, but after using them on scores and scores of picks, I have never had an issue. (Sure, that doesn't mean they are 100% safe and one can't come out if the operator does something uncharacteristic).
They are approved for overhead rigging by OSHA and that is okay with me.
Besides, I bed some sort of sliding cover could be made to keep the gate from opening...
[ QUOTE ]
In the eye and eye you still need enough sling to go around the piece and attatch the hook back to the sling correct?
[/ QUOTE ]
That's correct Mark. But, the effort and time doing so is faster than attaching with a clevis. I did a clevis for many years and hated unscrewing and screwing it in place. It takes time and adds up... (I'm a little OCD with this time stuff).
[ QUOTE ]
With endless loop slings it can be done the same. Noneed to take the sling off the crane hook. you just need a hook or shackle on the sling. Then it is no different.
If I understand your method correctly.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, it's no different than that method. But, we cannot assume all others use a clevis to choke off their endless loops as a time saving method.
And the sliding choker is very different than using a clevis to choke off a sling. On of my other points of this thread is the reduction of the cable bend ratio. Choking stuff off with a shackle has a poor bend ratio.
IMO. If these sliding hooks were on synthetics, with eye to eyes, then this may be the best thing since slice bread.