Say it ain't so....

Re: Say it ain\'t so....

It begins and ends with the client. They'll find someone to top if they really feel that is the way. Many know and care very little about trees. It is their house that is of primary concern. This is where the TCIA and ISA could play a role in educating the public on proper tree care practices.
 
Re: Say it ain\'t so....

Dude that is hysterical !! BUTT....... not as funny as Beranak saying "poop orifice"
grin.gif
 
Re: Say it ain\'t so....

why should cam say he is sorry? It was me that said his name.
let us see if I get this forum down yet?
RULES
1 You can poke and pick apart Joe Bob's tree service, but, not able to say anything about a Treebuzzer's.
2 Dont be cond, or say any mean things.
3 anyone who doesn't have a cert is not val able?
do I have it right?

man this $^!~ gets realll confussing.
 
Re: Say it ain\'t so....

TonyB, you don't know me. FT and I have worked together and talk every now and then on our cell phones, Stop by each others job sights. By no way are we bitter. FT and I talked about what I had posted. I aplogized to him personally and even ask him if he wanted me to pull the post. So what I do peronally or publicly think what you want Tony. I like FT just don't care for their companies practices. Their phone book add quote "relentless pursuit of exceptional arbor care and customer service." Yet I still see what I photographed.
 
Re: Say it ain\'t so....

Hollen, the focus is on the work as Mark pointed out not the company. The idea is to learn from examples both of good work and bad.

Take the step, raise the level of your discussion to help others learn.
 
Re: Say it ain\'t so....

[ QUOTE ]

anyone who doesn't have a cert is not valable?
do I have it right?

[/ QUOTE ]


No.



You have it freaking wrong......again.


And for goodness sake, you spelled valuable wrong. Have some respect for yourself and your reading audience.



I think it's time you drink a big glass of shut the hell up about the whole "Certs feel that they are better than other tree guys".

Nobody ever said that.


SZ
 
Re: Say it ain\'t so....

pssst, psst, know it all, I missed putting a space in (val) (able). I'm sorry sweety, does this mean no date tonite.
date.gif
I'll refrain from the quick replys and use office first from now on.
 
Re: Say it ain\'t so....

[ QUOTE ]
does this mean no date tonite.
date.gif


[/ QUOTE ]



In no way are you getting out of taking me to the Olive Garden tonight. And after that, we'll go home and watch my worn out copy of Amelie


SZ
 
!

[ QUOTE ]
Also damaged, lost, or stolen equipment is for the insurance companies, and it is definitely unacceptable to "fine" anyone for such things.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed, except for the "damaged." Damage from use is not covered by many, if any, insurance companies.

That begs the question, why did the equipment get damaged? Was it normal wear and tear? Or was it negligence on the part of the employee.

Quite frankly if after training and teaching and setting policy to make sure that stuff is not negligently damaged and an employee fails to follow the proper procedures or precautions then why shouldn't the employer be entitled to recover the losses?

If an employee understands that you don't toss the chainsaw from the tree or they'll be buying a new one guess what?! the chainsaws last a whole lot longer!

Nothing ticks me off more than employees who think they can do anything they want and they won't be held accountable.

And of course our wonderful government makes that a reality for "opressed the working man."

"Oh you got fired for showing up 4 hours late? Don't worry here is your unemployment check."

And employer gets to pay higher unemployment tax rates.

Then there is employee who refuses to wear the PPE he is issued, is constantly reminded to wear it, and once again fails to wear it and ends up getting injured! Osha shows up, fines the employer and workers comp pays the injured party.

And then the employer's WC rates go up.

Yep, it's a great thing when employees don't have to answer for not following the rules and for being careless!
crazy.gif


Of course, if employers can't recover those costs due to employee negligence then they can <u>TRY</u> to fire them.

After the wrongful dismissal suit sucks the company dry of course the employer will end up needing to find a new employee anyway. Or even end up looking for a job for themselves.

Hold employees acountable as much as society tries to hold employers accountable and see if things don't get better all around!
 
Re: Say it ain\'t so....

[ QUOTE ]
And after that, we'll go home and watch my worn out copy of Amelie


SZ

[/ QUOTE ]

This may seem a bit off topic, but seeing as Easy P brought it up - My wife and some of her buddies went to see Amelie in an 'Arthouse' cinema a few years back, she said it was really good. Turns out that French actress who played 'Amelie' was also in the plodding movie version of the Ron Howard(Richie from Happy Days) adaptation of Dan Brown's extremely popular mystery novel 'The Da Vinci Code' which I saw at the cinema, she was the best thing in it by far. Incidently, Ron Howard directed 'Backdraft' a Kurt Russell(Goldie Hawn's 'partner') vehicle which was widely panned by the critics for being an overly sentimental piece of trash which played to the bloated egos of the American fire Service who were only too happy to lap up all the attention.

amelie.jpg


Familytree is cool.
 
Re: Say it ain\'t so....

hollen I may be a little late on this but I think you have #1 right on. I spoke about this in a past thread. I do think that FT was right and should stick to his guns as stated before, but for some reason only certain non buzzers are picked on. The good old boys are; well the threads speak for themselves.
 
Re: Say it ain\'t so....

It's tough as an employer when you've got more than enough to juggle and then have to add the responsibility of properly documenting disciplinary actions to then be able to terminate with cause.

I know that it's a pain but that's the best way to handle it.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom