Even on a vertical, the direction of the loadforce is going to be down, but generally would have to be across horizontally to pinch line; to sieze system.
Forces are seriously reduced if you make no kerfs/ cross cuts in face, and muscle the load over as much as possible by groundman with line, as slowly as possible on a wide face hinge, before the line/pulley system takes the load and impact at 2:1 (unless load so long it's leveraged length becomes a factor). If you make a crosscut/kerf in face; after hinge just folds, the kerf closes, and the groundman's pull doesn't go to force more tensioned support fiber, but more compression support fiber; but this is pushing back against the direction you are trying to fold hinge; instead of pulling back. In either case the extra pull by groundie forces extra responding force in the tension and compression in hinge. The compression point precedes and makes more differance than the tensioned to the tree's support, so Nature uses it first, throwing off control by the tensioned fibers, so we craft face so Nature can't take earlier pivot than we intend, by not allowing a kerf across face to close against us. If it does, this puts the control in the face where the saw can't reach, instead of at the backcut/ operator's area. When you trigger the backcut to release, there is no gradual release of fibers over a stretch of hinge fiber to the closed pivot of the kerf you made, but empty space; so system goes from a lot of tensioned, leveraged support away from the pivot of the closed kerf, to suddenly none. Without a kerf in face/crossed cuts/dutch, there is no distance without fiber between the tensioned fiber and the compressed fiber, so release is more gradual. Wide face as final constraint on time hinge can hold on, allowing fuller use of the effect.