Poplar

Lunchtime. The tree had been topped heavily in the past, and there was no central top anchor point. The central stem had decayed back about 10 feet, so had to use the side stems for lowerering. The left hand pulley was in an ideal location but a bit weak so backed it up to the next larger stem. More height would have been better but not possible. Everything swung round and through the gateway quite easily.
 

Attachments

  • 11898-Poplar 3.webp
    11898-Poplar 3.webp
    324.7 KB · Views: 317
Half way to completion I bombed this estimate cause I thought the limb would fall out once some of the low limbs were cut. 'Not so' said the tree 'now young mangoes you must climb.' I had to cut the tear that was holding the branch up. Pretty big trees, there's another 3 like this on the property, all topped about 25 years ago, what a shame. I think these would be bigger than the one I climbed in Pittsburgh a few weeks ago if they hadn't been topped.
 

Attachments

  • 12284-lawrencesmall2.webp
    12284-lawrencesmall2.webp
    121.2 KB · Views: 220
Looking for input. I posted a picture of a very large, very topped Cottonwood a few posts earlier. It had some storm damage and I cleaned up the mess. However now the client is looking for prices to retop the trees. I have a disdain for tree topping but these are the ONLY trees for several hundred feet in all directions of the property. They have suppremely large girth for our area, DBH of 6-7feet for each of the 4 trees. It would be a loss to see those trunks gone...... but should they be retopped. I feel that if I were to either remove or top them that I would use a crane and bucket truck. I don't feel that I can trust those suckers to rig off. That being said the trees are on a NW faceing waterfront with a big lake on which NW winds get pretty high so maybe they're strong enough...... my gut says crane though.


Thoughts.... anyone?
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom