As long as you're willing to pay for it the utilities will put the lines under ground, but I have heard nothing but complaints about rates. The other thing to realize about under ground is that because its burried its not accesible without a lot of digging. To install it you need to trench, as I don't think most utilities (customers) could afford to bore next to every tree. At least here in AZ a large percentage of new contruction (usually in new developments) has to be under ground, so we're moving that direction, but over head lines will exist for a long time. Now if we could just stop the dig ins when landscapers go to plant trees, that would be great.
I work for the utility that is cooperating with the city of Phoenix to plant the right trees in the right places. In fact I believe the utility paid for the inventory of the trees for the city. I work in Norther AZ and do not have a lot to do what goes on in Phoenix but did have the crews I work with there late this winter and had the chance to work with a city forester that understood the need for proper trees around the utility lines. The utility and the city share resources to make removals and replacements work. In one case I was able to remove about a half a dozen date and mexican fan palms that had been planted under or just to the sides of a 21kV line, and the utility paid for the removal, the new trees and the planting of the new trees (wire friendly) all with no complaints from either sides. I think that is a better investment than trenching back yard for new lines and digging up under ground faults while destroying root systems of existing trees. I still feel strongly about educating the customer on proer tree selection and care. I have had great response from customers when you give them some pointers on planting new wire friendly trees.
Thanks Tom, I really enjoyed reading the article and I guess it made the rounds to the leaders higher up.