More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipients

Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Very absurd and rude IMO!





[/ QUOTE ]


There's a certain amount of certainty in that post. Hmmm, sounds absurd.




SZ

[/ QUOTE ]

Literally!
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

I love how you guys stick me to the stakes and make me define my decisions. Yet when asked to answer the question at hand, you all trun on me and dodge the questions.

This is begining to be no fun, I post new threads and you guys run amock spouting off aout bush/Rush/Palin/GOP etc etc. but dodging the original question, ALWAYS!
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

And for the record it IS absurd to me that my tax dollars are going to this. never even heard of it until I saw it on a TV commercial asking for applicants!
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

[ QUOTE ]
For the record, I am having no fun either.


SZ

[/ QUOTE ]

EZ

Youre the best! Everytime I get too involved you make me crack up!

cant wait for Providence!
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

[ QUOTE ]
Been on my front porch, looking to see if I can see Russia too.

Hmm, can't.

Darn it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oak its a simple yes or no question.

actually has nothing to do with a Governor from Alaska at all.
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


I never claimed we were based on Libertarianism. ".

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought it was implied. My bad. I thought you were a libertarian voting libertarian who was advocating a libertarian system. Are you a libertarian or a liberalatarian???



Back to the topic. I don't care about them giving people phones. If they were talking about assistance to get a land line would you still care so much? Cell phones are cheap these days and if we can do something to improve someones life and make it safer, I'm all for it.
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

actually I am a conservative Independent, who votes Libertarian when I can, I.e. on the ticket. I would register as such, I don't like their views on drugs.

Landlines are different. so your telling me these people need phones for when their out and maybe get in an accident say? afford a car and insurance (mandatory in MA) but not a cheap phone while on welfare? im not buying it! you have to Already be ON welfare to b e eligible for the phones.
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

Haven't had to get a new phone in awhile, but last time I did it was about 70 bucks just to get it installed. Cell phones are practically free now, and if all it can do is call 911, what's the problem? Even with calling ability, cell phones are generally cheaper than land lines, assuming you can restrain your talking and don't rack up 100's of minutes.

How many black eyes have you given yourself jerking that knee?
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

Here in this town, we all give old still-functional cells phones away to those who either need them, or could possibly
save a life by having them. Their's or someone else's. 911 calls are free even if there's no service plan contract.

In light of a drought here that could find explosive tinder not unlike New South Wales, its possible dialing 911 could save countless lives and properties. If Boston or other metro areas had voluntary programs like this, probably would effect some crime statistics, might even help some people get jobs? Knowing a lot of the better-off people got better off by hoarding and exploiting, I'd expect a mandatory program could be of positive use.

I still can't seem to get any porn on my cell though, how'd you do that Bull? I can't even call Russia from here darn it.
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

[ QUOTE ]
Here in this town, we all give old still-functional cells phones away to those who either need them, or could possibly
save a life by having them. Their's or someone else's. 911 calls are free even if there's no service plan contract.

In light of a drought here that could find explosive tinder not unlike New South Wales, its possible dialing 911 could save countless lives and properties. If Boston or other metro areas had voluntary programs like this, probably would effect some crime statistics, might even help some people get jobs? Knowing a lot of the better-off people got better off by hoarding and exploiting, I'd expect a mandatory program could be of positive use.

I still can't seem to get any porn on my cell though, how'd you do that Bull? I can't even call Russia from here darn it.

[/ QUOTE ]

great original argument old oakie! I like the new take on Russia.

So how do you feel about your federal tax dollars going to MA welfare recipients?
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

[ QUOTE ]
Haven't had to get a new phone in awhile, but last time I did it was about 70 bucks just to get it installed. Cell phones are practically free now, and if all it can do is call 911, what's the problem? Even with calling ability, cell phones are generally cheaper than land lines, assuming you can restrain your talking and don't rack up 100's of minutes.

How many black eyes have you given yourself jerking that knee?

[/ QUOTE ]

Jerking knee? I think this program is a complete crock! Follow the link and educate yourself, before commenting please.
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

I like the cellphone idea.

And if my taxes don't go up, which in my category won't, I'm at ease having some monies going to people who lost jobs, or can't find them over Blackwater or tax cuts for Exxon/Mobil or some faith-based NGO to teach the King James version of the Bible to people in Siberia.
 
Re: More welfare, ONLY for current welfare recipie

I don't see how a land line is different. How do you think it is? If the govt is going to have a program like this it might as well be technologically up to date as possible. Pretty much everyone I know doesn't have a land line, they're obsolete.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom