MISINFORMATION: Note Edit Kubrick Admits he faked the moon landing videos

Status
Not open for further replies.
Daniel said:
That's almost funny that you somehow trust a "Fact checker" more than what you see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears. HOW could that video be anything but what it is. You can read Kubricks lips. The only thing that might me altered is the interviewer's voice. That could have been dubbed. But Kubrick says all that anyone needs to hear on the subject. What if the fact-checkers actually work for the deep state? What if "his daughter and many others" were pressured into "dismissing" the video. And what exactly about the video doesn't stand up to "fact check"?

Can anyone dispute the words that he is saying? If not, then he would have to be lying. SO are you calling Kubrick a liar? Let's get specific. The bottom line is your worldview would come crashing down if you had to finally admit that the moon landing was fake. You wouldn't sleep for a week. Next, you might find out that the US isn't "The greatest country in the world" anymore. And then if you found out that the USA is actually the greatest terrorist organization on the planet, you'd really be screwed. You probably can't handle the truth. You're probably better off in your fabricated world. So much less responsibility.. you can point the finger at Putin and say "he's the bad guy". That's comforting: almost as good as peanut butter and jelly.
Click to expand...

That's almost as funny as you thinking "it will take 10-20" years to mean "we can't do it in less". It's literally mundane to land a man on the moon. Given the funds I'm sure they could make it happen in less than a year.
 
Reach said:
It seems to me it is quite possible that it would take three times a long today to put a man on the moon as it took back then.
Click to expand...
In the Space Race to beat the Russians, money was no object and risk tolerance was higher. Just the budget constraints make things slower now.

Just don't put the Highway Dept. in charge of going to the moon. It would be the next century. They're planning to take a total of 40 years to build a 52 mile highway near me.
 
TreeCo said:
You ought to delete Daniel's nonsense.
Click to expand...
It amazes me how liberals so easily hand away their rights. Why is it that you are all so against freedom of speech? Who cares if what Daniel is saying is non-sense. You don’t have to read it! One of these days your beloved “fact checkers” are going to tell you that you’re not allowed to run your business or leave your house and you will have to wait for the government to hand you money…oh wait, that already happened…
 
There are plenty of easy to find replies to every point D brings up. I only have Google to help me. If I went up to the library I'd have even better search engines...Lexus/Nexus, etc.

For mundane thinks Snopes is fine. Good starting point.

D's smugness that he uses as answers rather than in a sincere question/answer discussion is so grade school. If he focused answered questions in a discussion type format there might be a reason to listen.

Kubrick's daughter/family says that's not SK. Dates don't line up either. Easy to show that the interview is fakey.

My word...so easy to answer the smug moon landing timeline...like as been said. Less risk tolerance as well as 'mission creep'. What is planned for the new moon shot is much more robust than Apollo.

Keeping facts in line can be difficult and awkward to talk about. The reason the the work for C19 research has seemed to go so fast is that it isn't the first iteration. This is the year 2019 VARIATION on what has been around for a while.


boring...boring...boring...

All of this BS isn't new and nothing new will be brought to this thread. That's my issue with this sort of blathering. Using TreeBuzz.com holding the bucket for you is really impolite. If you want, go buy your own soapbox.

Start answering questions
stay focused---from Kubrick to C19 to moon shots..focus
Discuss
Knock off smug

Is there any new life for this? If not...getting close to sunset time.
 
Daniel said:
That's almost funny that you somehow trust a "Fact checker" more than what you see with your own eyes and hear with your own ears. HOW could that video be anything but what it is. You can read Kubricks lips. The only thing that might me altered is the interviewer's voice. That could have been dubbed. But Kubrick says all that anyone needs to hear on the subject. What if the fact-checkers actually work for the deep state? What if "his daughter and many others" were pressured into "dismissing" the video. And what exactly about the video doesn't stand up to "fact check"?

Can anyone dispute the words that he is saying? If not, then he would have to be lying. SO are you calling Kubrick a liar? Let's get specific. The bottom line is your worldview would come crashing down if you had to finally admit that the moon landing was fake. You wouldn't sleep for a week. Next, you might find out that the US isn't "The greatest country in the world" anymore. And then if you found out that the USA is actually the greatest terrorist organization on the planet, you'd really be screwed. You probably can't handle the truth. You're probably better off in your fabricated world. So much less responsibility.. you can point the finger at Putin and say "he's the bad guy". That's comforting: almost as good as peanut butter and jelly.
Click to expand...
OK, let's be clear, I didn't watch the video--your words have been enough for me. You seem to claim that EVERYONE on the planet is lying, either because they have been threatened, or paid off, or are themselves part of these grand conspiracies, but it is no way possible that Kubrick lied!
 
Boomslang said:
"They faked the moon landing"....why?
"They've convinced us the earth is round"...why?
"Vaccines have mind control microchips"...why?

It amazes me that all the conspiracy theorists out there can't come up with a logical explanation to why anyone would bother with this nonsense.

"It's to keep us subjugated"

Ok.....but why?

"So the Illuminati can run the world"

Ok...but why?

"You're just a sheeple, too dumb and blind to see the truth"

Ok...so you, the enlightened truth seeker, have nothing better to do than waste your enlightenment on brainwashed subjects of the overlords, rather than use your profound knowledge to change things.
Click to expand...
hard to change things if nobody believes you. it takes a village
 
here is a 1998 interview with Kubrick...
same time period as the op video

obviously these are not the same person.

So I apologize for falling for and spreading misinformation.

ps... the moon landing was still faked IMO.

for me this is a good lesson in discernment and reservation.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom