TheTreeSpyder
Branched out member
- Location
- Florida>>> USA
Take the spar mounted to, versus the direction of pull. A Pull direction away from the host/ spar/ mount would be perpendicular/ right angle pull (chapter 21 in ABok). Whereas, a pull direction Pairallell/ inline with the host/ spar/ mount would be a lenghtwise pull (separated into the following chapter 22 in ABoK for good reason).
Really,by the mechanics presented in the above resource, a Timber Hitch is more proper on perpendicular/ right angle of pull. whereby it's close brethren the Killick is proper on a lenghtwise pull.
The reason being, that pulling a Timber perpendicular to mount or load seats the back of the trapping loop inline with the standing; there fore not leveraging the trap weaker (or to higher tension and changing direction).
But if pulling lenghtwise the force doesn't travel inline to the back of the trapping loop to secure (from the standing tension/ mainline). But, place a half hitch or marl preceding on a lengthwise pull, changes the mechanics. Now the main tension is in this preceding part, and the flow of force travels through the precedent and then exits inline to the standing tension part properly. Then the force flow (think of like electrical force flowing thru a wire path) goes to the Timber Hitch part. Now it still will pull perpendicular on this part, leveraging the force that exited the precedent (half hitch or marl) and be leveraged in terms of it, but it would be less force than the standing tension(being less than the initiating force of the standing, would be said to not be leveraged, or at least not leveraged higher etc.), and also a secondary grip.
i believe one going thru ABoK's 2 back to back chapters will show these patterns.
Really,by the mechanics presented in the above resource, a Timber Hitch is more proper on perpendicular/ right angle of pull. whereby it's close brethren the Killick is proper on a lenghtwise pull.
The reason being, that pulling a Timber perpendicular to mount or load seats the back of the trapping loop inline with the standing; there fore not leveraging the trap weaker (or to higher tension and changing direction).
But if pulling lenghtwise the force doesn't travel inline to the back of the trapping loop to secure (from the standing tension/ mainline). But, place a half hitch or marl preceding on a lengthwise pull, changes the mechanics. Now the main tension is in this preceding part, and the flow of force travels through the precedent and then exits inline to the standing tension part properly. Then the force flow (think of like electrical force flowing thru a wire path) goes to the Timber Hitch part. Now it still will pull perpendicular on this part, leveraging the force that exited the precedent (half hitch or marl) and be leveraged in terms of it, but it would be less force than the standing tension(being less than the initiating force of the standing, would be said to not be leveraged, or at least not leveraged higher etc.), and also a secondary grip.
i believe one going thru ABoK's 2 back to back chapters will show these patterns.