I'm a natural areas applicator.
Usually, glyphosate is used on herbaceous plants as a foliar spray. Before air potato beetles, I sprayed 1% with a leaf-penetrating surfactant into tree canopies to selectively kill elevated air potato. The tree leaves might burn off under the surfactant exposure, but the trees would just releaf.
Triclopyr is great for treating most woody-tissued vines and trees, except Albizia/mimosa, and wisteria. Triclopyr usually comes to homeowners through big box stores in a dilute amine form, because it's fairly safe that way for both the people and plants (still, the amine is presumably not great for your eyes). The dilution renders it ineffective for cut stump application, but it is often over twice as concentrated as I use for most foliar treatments... The different ways to formulate and mix triclopyr make it hard for a homeowner to use, both to get results (which manifest around month 2) and to avoid off target damage. At day's end, best to get a professional out with anything that isn't glyphosate...
These two herbicides are primary go-tos, but there are lots of other herbicides and adjuvants used in specific situations.
Anything starting with "imaza" likely means that it will slay everything but pines, at label rate, and be soil active for 6 months. It is very "hot" to handle. It is also a great killer in combination with other herbicides. In an herbicide cocktail, Imaza-whatever can be mixed up at low concentration to give a boost to the main herbicide, greatly reducing its half-life decay time to bring your soil out of scorched earth status.
In general, it's hard to sell herbicides of any type with bark penetrant to homeowners because the bark penetrant is an ester and oil-based formulation that soaks through bark/skin, but also floats on water surfaces, creating a hazard for amphibians and other wildlife in that surface habitat zone. Bark penetrants are great for vectoring herbicide into rough woody-tissued trees and woody vines.
Hth