Bradford pear trees topped need some Advice

Which saddle should I purchase.

  • Glide 2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Master's Deluxe

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
I really do not think anyone is making that catastrophic of a deal. Its a thread on a chat site. Professionals are disputing thier perspective ideals. Mine is "Do not promote an incorrect practice." I don't think this is bad mouthing someone's work.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I would like to say that I resent FlashTreetop1 co-opting my "Boo-Ya" catchphrase (which I stole from Stuart Scott)

But in essence I agree with his assessment of Noel's handiwork.


Bradford Pears are a scourge. Many people love them. I always counsel clients to delay all outlay of cash on a Bradford until it is time for it to come down, or clean up the fallen mess.

This whole holier than thou, "where do we draw the line?" bull plop will rage on forever.

The fight between good arborists and evil, Bradford Pear hating arborists will continue harmlessly on the messageboards of Treebuzz.

SZ [/quote






Actually, I do believe the "Boo-Yah" catch frase came from me Easy. Not that it matters or anything.
tongue.gif
 
[ QUOTE ]
Hmm,

How about a redirection in the grove? Maybe a commitment to removing some of these behemoths and replanting, phasing in a more suitable species.

On our campus we consider Bradfords, amongst other trees to be short to intermediate term lifespan. They get removed and replaced to adapt to the landscape.

We have some Aristocrat pears that appear to have a better branching structure.

[/ QUOTE ]


My thoughts exactly Jim.

That's thinkin' long term.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I am a good arborist. Not worried about someone on here trying to bully me around or report me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't see anyone bullying you at all just having converes about your poor work ethics. I thought when you take that BCMA you kind of take an oath not to do poor work practices no matter what. Problem is your not worried about any of it cuase fact is the ISA wont do anything to you. As I always say, in MOST cases, them certs just give reason for someone to try and charge more. Guess that rule on topping trees was the 30% of the test he didn't pass.

[ QUOTE ]
Let me change my 1st statement, nothing will happen to Noel unless you all try to make something of it. Which I would not put past a few of you.

[/ QUOTE ]

And why shouldn't someone or other BMCA try to do something? I recall just another post where poor Larry was crusified for his style of tree work. The new channle was emailed, his boss was emailed, and not by just one or two guys. Why shouldn't this someone pay the same price.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Good job on the pears Noel, I think they looked gr8!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

as would any landscaper too. I recall and artical in the TCIA where a landscaping firm was sued for just such work, fact is it was in a TCIA mag of this year. Now they where sued a very large sum, cuase an arborist said that the trees were ruined by the method used to trim them. Landscapers defence was a tree in the eyes of a landscaper should be trimmed different then a tree in the eyes of an arborist.

Your right I anit a tree god, just yet another tree man like all here but if we have cert guys doing such work it should be brought to the boards attention that they are doing so. And I recall you bashing Larry so why the change of heart? Is it cuase this Guy is your freind? You should stand on one side of the fence unlike your freind who seams to hop back and forth just to make a pay check.
 
If you look back far enough in most guys careers youll see some regret and some mistakes made.Im sure at one time most of us wore spikes on pruning and topped trees.If youve been in this long enough you did your share of one handed chainsaw use,free climbibg,lions tailing and working while not following proper regulations.We slowly evolve and things change and so have most of us.Usually the guys who have just recently come around seem to be the most dogmatic and self righteous and quick to point out so called errors(I guess the guilt is fresh).How quickly they forget where they started.Bradford Pear is temporary at best,good for a while but destined to fail.Not everything is black in white in this industry-try thinking things through experience and not just that new certification manual!Boring!
 
We are not talking about new guys here. No-one is trying to be a tree GOD. I personally would not be proud of promoting a practice like topping. Again things happen, but if a novice was to view this an arguement for unsavory work can be made. I do not condone written improper practices. Do they happen? Unfortunately yes. I still try to do the right thing more than when possible. Certainly I think posting those pictures was a mistake.
 
[ QUOTE ]
(I guess the guilt is fresh).How quickly they forget where they started.Bradford Pear is temporary at best,good for a while but destined to fail.Not everything is black in white in this industry-try thinking things through experience and not just that new certification manual!Boring!

[/ QUOTE ]

LMMFAO, wtf you all are the GD same. I never frogot where I came from and yes we did do things different back in the day. But all that stuff you just brought up was industry standards. Pruning used to be 1/3 of the limb, topping was also something we did. But, as education evoles we stopped all that and moved forward. Your freind with his very fresh BMCA cert should know all this.

But, Jim maybe you don't know about the code one takes onto his shoulders when he puts himself on such a high shelf. but just for you I'll give you the link

http://www.isa-arbor.net/Certification/resources/BCMA_Code_of_Ethics.pdf

Now if you'll read that you'll find that other BCMA are supposed to report any and all violations or they too are in violation.

Now I see ya'll want to bash the bozo tree guy that does not come here or is not cert but yet when one of your own bashes the system we should wink and brush it off. Well I say if you going to bash one bash all that do wrong, and if all that don't agree suck roosters by choose. Cause this is an on going thing here in NJ there are NJ state CA that pretty much take the same oath and yet I see 2-3 in Burlington county that just do whatever they want to trees with no remores. It's like it's all for money who cares what the guy does with it after he passes the test we got his money, and he has to get CEU's to keep it so we keep making money, All BS if you ask me.
 
I do not "top"pears either ! However I will not condem a guy for doin it! Lets be real here every rule in life is at times bent or broken? let us not be pius about it!?? I think we can all agree pears are a unique case!
 
Hollen's got a good point. The issue is adherence to a Code of Ethics not a rule. Could that have been a crown reduction? It looks like it to me.
I just did a crown reduction on a Norway Maple that had 3 of it's 5 leaders topped badly. I reduced the remaining leaders as the client was concerned over the breaking off of limbs that had occurred. The tree has Verticillium wilt so I explained to the client that the reduction is a temporary measure and the next step is removal.

It's difficult when a significant piece of business is offered. Could you have spent more time explaining the difference between the crown reduction and topping and the subsequent benefits to the trees and client? That may have justified the additional cost and allowed you to develop a portfolio of proper pruning practices to showcase to others.
 
Hollenreich (wow, I spelled it right this time, seems I can spell names better when I agree with them), has made some very good points.

Now I do see why he gets angry towards certified arborists and tree experts.
 
treehumper, I wish it was a proper crownreduction or even close to something like that.

Maybe your computer screen isn't showing the picturs as large as mine is.

There is no cut back to a lateral, everything ends in a stub cut.

The cutting point was only dictated by a geometric shape, nothing to do with proper ansi pruning.

I am not calling names here, I am not being rude. Unless rude is not agreeing with someone.

attached is his same picture, but just a portion of it so the pictures comes zoomed in closer for you.
 

Attachments

  • 147901-closeupcopy.webp
    147901-closeupcopy.webp
    67.1 KB · Views: 90
KyLimbwalker,

what the heck are you talking about man?

Re-read all my posts to Noel, where was I anything that you said I was to him?

Is it Blasphemy to say that I don't agree with something a BMCA posted pictures of. He put it on a public forum, he holds a prestigious title.

What he says and shows will influence a lot of people. If he shows it, he is promoting it.

He doesn't have to actually say, "this is how pears should be done". If he's showing that this is his work, he is promoting it.

If he does that kind of work, he should at least have not shown it. Now I think he should later state that what he does is not to ANSI standards and should not be performed.

I am not doing this to attack HIM. I just can't stand topping and I want it to be seen that there are other ISA Certified Arborist out there that do NOT agree with it. No one was hardly saying anything against it until I spoke up.
 
This profession should not show topped trees.

ANSI A300 2008:

4.51 topping: Reduction of tree size using internodal cuts without regard to tree health or structural integrity. Topping is not an acceptable pruning practice (6.1.7)

6.1.7 Topping and lion's tailing shall be considered unacceptable pruning practices for trees.



<u>ISA Board-Certified Master Arborist Code of Ethics:</u>

II.C.9.
Responsibility and commitment to act in a manner consistent with all generally accepted professional standards.

Isn't ANSI A300 a "generally accepted professional standard"?
 
Do not promote topping.

I wish this thread was erased or at least didn’t have a Board Master Certified Arborist posting pictures of topped trees and saying it is something that he does. If you are saying it is something that you do, then you are promoting it. As an ISA Certified Arborist, I feel the need to say that it is wrong and should not be done. If this pisses people off, then so be it.

I just re-read everything from my first post. I searched to see if I was ever attacking, condescending, rude or needed to calm down my discussion to Noel.

I did not find even one sentence that was any of these things.

I actually gave him praise several times.

I only got “smart” with flashtop, because that’s the way he was with me.

I think Noel and his two buddies Flashtop and KyLimbwalker think that I’m being rude and attacking simply because I am not agreeing with the work he did. I don’t believe he ever hears someone disagreeing with his work and this is why it seems rude. Go back and read all of my posts to Noel. Where was I once Rude or talking down to him (condescending).

I guess we must be acting like “tree Gods” or “tree police” to ever question the work of a Board Certified Master Arborist. Or else I guess it is blasphemy maybe to not agree with him or his minions. (okay, poking a little fun there by using minions).

Flashtop, to answer your question: I actually do not talk bad to my customers about the other tree companies in my area. I do generalize the bad ones sometimes by calling them, “hacks”, “hillbillies”, “idiots” or just a “guy and a pickup truck”. Because these are the ones that hurt my business by doing things much cheaper because they do not have the insurance, education and running costs as we do. Plus if they hack up a tree: I have to spend more time with a customer to try and convince them not to have their tree done like the person down the street. -OR- Maybe I have to present a customer with an expensive estimate (which I may not get) on trying to correct their tree after a topping 5 years prior, when it would have been a lot faster and cheaper if it hadn’t been topped.

I believe that most tree services work very hard for their money and I respect the tree services around me. If a competitor tree service in the area has a problem, I am quick to help. I surely do not do it for financial gain, as I never come out ahead monetarily. I have climbed for many in the area when they had a sick climber or lost a climber, I have finished jobs for them, I have loaned them equipment and used our crane to help them. I give them advice that improved their productivity; that has surely hurt me financially. I do it because it’s a good thing to help people and I have a respect for tree service business owners. I won’t likely get ahead in business doing this, but maybe if I need help someday, they will help me, or surely it goes well with the man upstairs.

When I first learned Noel is a BCMA I honestly got worried that him posting pictures like that might hurt him. I wish he would say something to make it better.

Noel repeatedly saying he’s not sorry he ever posted the pictures and comments is a fallacy. Because who wouldn’t be sorry.

When I first got on treebuzz years ago, I posted some pictures of a large oak we saved that was up-rooting into a river. I installed guide cables and used ¾” threaded rods through the tree as the anchor points. The rods were left quite long, the amon eyes were not near the bark. I was slammed on treebuzz and was told it was crappy work (in short). And I wasn’t told in a nice way if I recall correctly. Anyway, I was sorry that I ever posted those pictures; why? Because they were right, it wasn’t to proper cabling standards. Even though that large tree doesn’t move in the wind and those rods aren’t going to get metal fatigue, it was not to proper standards and I shouldn’t have shown it as my work on a public forum. Now, I wasn’t an ISA Certified Arborist back then, so at least I wasn’t degrading the Certified Arborist image.

I don’t like seeing an ISA Certified Arborist, a Certified Tree Expert and certainly not a Board Certified Master Arborist topping trees. These are the top guys in the industry that should be showing that they follow the American National Standard.

He put it on a public forum and in doing so is promoting it simply by showing that this is what he does and will continue to do. It wouldn’t matter much if he wasn’t a BCMA. If it was a new tree service owner that had no credentials to his name, well, (everyone would probably pounce on him and tell him what he’s doing wrong). But it wouldn’t matter that much because he doesn’t have a title and the ISA reputation to keep.

It’s like this: If a 25 year old trailer park kid goes to Walmart and steals and gets caught. It’s not that big of a deal, who is he representing? What, just 25 year-olds with maybe a rough life.

But, lets say a Police Officer that’s been on the force for 10 years, goes into Walmart and he gets caught for stealing. IT’S A BIG FREAKIN DEAL. He should follow the law, he is representing a law-biding organization. It is not just his reputation his is risking, it is the reputation of the whole police force.

I don’t want Noel to get in trouble and I doubt he would. But, as long as this is on a public forum, I feel someone has to stand up on the forum and say that this topping should not be done. I would not even think about “turning him in”, I think this should end here. I’m not going to say it was a crown reduction or some other term that is an accepted practice. I sure would like to, but it’s not. I wish he never posted those pictures. Why? Because I’m an ISA Certified Arborist too. Just like a cop that doesn’t want the public to see another cop doing something wrong.

I really wish tree buzz didn’t have a BMCA posting pictures of topped trees and saying it is something that he does. If you are saying it is something that you do, then you are promoting it. I as an ISA Certified Arborist, I feel the need to say that it is wrong and should not be done. If this pisses people off, then so be it.

If someone else adds to this post saying that this topping is okay, I’m going to continue the discussion.

Now, I’d like to see a few more people step up and say this is wrong, or at least vote on the survey I posted earlier. So far, to the question, “Is it Okay to top a bradford pear?”, 3 people clicked YES, 12 people clicked NO. That’s good to see.
 
Back
Top Bottom