[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I thought the whole exercise was junk Norm, a couple of days ago. But since reading a little more into it, I dont believe the true objective was to successfully catch the log, more just to see what would happen, and if failure occurred, where and why.
[/ QUOTE ]
Ok,
Given that's true, why did they side load the tree? Couldn't they have taken a wrap or 1/2 wrap at the base of the tree?
They were all having a good laugh, but why break such a cardinal rule, then out it on youtube? MANY MEN have DIED becasue of side loading.. Its a bad example PERIOD!
[/ QUOTE ]
I think the answer is in the paragraph you already quoted me on Dan....the last part especially, although I cant speak for the persons involved.
I do believe the whole thing was undertaken in a controlled environment, no persons on or within falling distance of the spar. If side loading and not the shackle had played the part in the faliure, then that would've presumably been the main talking point thereafter. It is not a how-to video.
A strategy/technique is a choice, as is climbing a tree in the first place....therefore only as dangerous as the people orchestrating the task of the particular situation. Doesn't matter who you are, its all about choices. If you make a bad choice, you own it.