ALB in Ohio

ALB and EAB completely different treatments. One lives between the bark and cambium, one bores into the sap wood past the cambium. Treatments are only partially effective on NON infested ALB trees. This insect is good, in MA it has struck 2 species that weren't on the list before this infestation. it is very adaptable.

Canada got their ALB treatment right, and got rid of it fast!
 
Here in New Jersey they removed all host trees and replanted. It wasn't pretty but successful. I believe Carteret, Linden, woodbridge and rahway were the towns hit. I was only on the replanting part which was satisfying to a degree. This was in 2006 and 2007.
 
I have had email conversations with Dr. Dan Herms, Prof. of Entomology and lead researcher at Ohio State for years and this is what he said yesterday after I asked him a few questions.

"The rate of spread in order of magnitude is slower than eab, and trees survive much longer as the tree can tolerate alb feeding, which is deep in the sapwood and heartwood, much better than the phloem feeding of eab.

Alb tends to cause more structural damage resulting in breaking up in ice and wind storms. Insecticides are not very effective on infested trees because larvae feed deep in the wood.

Insecticides are targeted at adults while they are doing maturation feeding on small twigs prior to laying eggs."

It seems these two "inside" infestations are similar in some ways, and one is worse than the other in some ways.

How do you guys in infestation areas deal with being "Regulated"? Is it enforced and monitored in quarantine zones? They did absolutely nothing with quarantine here with eab although they talked a big game. No funding and depleted or eliminated staffs.
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom