3 Oaks

I got some decent shots of these 3 oaks. I'm going to post this one, then I need someone to tell me if it's coming out ok so I don't waste time with the others.

You got the leaner to the left, solo dead and the dead half of the other. The remaining half of last tree will come down later, along with other problems they have.

Later
 

Attachments

  • 40664-108_3oaks.webp
    40664-108_3oaks.webp
    550.9 KB · Views: 253
These pics started at 2142x2856. It's down to 800x1065. Tell me how this one looks. To me it's losing detail. Just want to make sure everyone can see whats goin on.

This is the last tree to come down. I'm starting backwards to save the good shots for last.

Later
 
To me that looks like crap. Heres the culprit on the last post that likes to make her own rules...

I'll have the rest worked out and posted later on.
 

Attachments

  • 40683-tori.webp
    40683-tori.webp
    101.6 KB · Views: 149
Yeah, that second one does look like crap. You cannot shrink a JPEG image and then re-expand it without a loss in quality. Quality suffers greatly with every manipulation of a JPEG and for the most part enlarging one is a total exercise in futility.

What good is a pic that you have to pan the screen around on? If it's "larger" than your screen and you're viewing it full screen (or full window if the window is, like mine almost alway are, smaller than the full screen) and don't have to pan it, then it's being shrunk before you even see it so why deal with the extra data?

I'm sorry to be so cold, but this stuff is not rocket science. Here's (attached) the first image in a reasonable state. It's been dimensionally reduced 50% and the quality level has been dropped from an unreasonable (actually, quite optimistic since it was evidently taken with a low quality camera or handled by software which could not maintain the needed quality factor) factor of 90 to a Web-friendly 75.

The conversion was obtained by using the program "convert" and entering from within the directory containing the image the command:

convert -resize 50% -quality 75 40664-108_3oaks.jpg 3oaks.jpg

(should be all on one line) Easy as pie; in fact, nothing could possibly approach it for user-friendliness. By the time one waded through a GUI with various levels of menu selections they'd still have to put their hands to the keyboard to type in the file name they want to save it as. By using a good command-line utility one doesn't even have to mess with the mouse. It's vastly quicker to accomplish such an easy task that way. To those who would argue that it's difficult to remember all these arcane commands to type I counter that it's just as difficult, if not more, to remember which combinations of drop-down menus must be navigated just to get to the program in the first place, then again to actually use it; not to mention with the GUI it's usually quite impossible to automate such things. From the command line you could automatically tailor a whole directory hierarchy full of images in one fell swoop.

Enough said?
 

Attachments

  • 40688-3oaks.webp
    40688-3oaks.webp
    125.5 KB · Views: 126
aaf_roll.gif
 
Ok i'll try to go in order. This is Teti on the first tree.
He trimmed a couple of limbs off, then tied off the top. We had 2 ropes on the trunk and one on the top, 2 winches , 1 porto. Teti had 2 on himself.
 

Attachments

  • 40785-111_3oaks.webp
    40785-111_3oaks.webp
    424.3 KB · Views: 156
Once that cut was made we lowered the trunk to make room for the top. Joey is trying to unjam Mikes 2nd line. Everything came out great.
 

Attachments

  • 40794-114_3oaks.webp
    40794-114_3oaks.webp
    392.8 KB · Views: 135
Joeys head peekin out like a racoon wondering where his home just went. This tree was like playing "name that cut".
I said I could take that tree in 6 cuts, Joey said 5, so away he went.
 

Attachments

  • 40801-103_0285.webp
    40801-103_0285.webp
    295.3 KB · Views: 119

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom