I live in Tulsa and know Paul Nosak well. I like Paul but he doesn't like me (You will hafto private message me on that one). I get to see the live version. I am in my 25th year of business in the trees. 20th in crane removals (95 % of my work now, is craners), Nosak...has about 7-8 years of doing tree work, I think, and has built his business faster than anyone I have ever seen(I gotta give it up to him for that part), but at an obvious cost(obvious to us, but not to all). He was a local roofer who started doing trees on the side after a wind storm. Seen the bobcat deal many times. We both have the same cranes,(actually they are Boom Trucks)Simon/Terex 4792, But mine has been modified by me to fit the tree industry. When my crane was a cabmount it was light on the end when going over the front. I was told ( by the chart )it was a full 360 but it was not, dont care what it said. Set up on unlevel ground with front tires off of ground , go over the front and voila!, down goes the front, up goes the back. Even with tires on the ground there is way too much deflection, So I added a front stabilizer, but still wasn't happy. Now I had to be extreemely accurate on the amount of pressure that was put on each outrigger . Too much on the front and I'm light on the sides with a massive ammount of deflection, and a very noticeable lifting of the opposite out rigger, unnerving to say the least. Too much on the mains and I am light over the front with the same unacceptable deflection. When I got the pressure issue just right, I still felt like I was using a fishing pole to pick with. My crane now has been heavily modified to fit what I do, Just putting the crane on the rear was not enough to erase the deflection inherent with the Simon/Terex sub-base system, but thats another story. Pauls crane doesn't have any counter weights, nor does it have a front stabilizer for going over the front. If my crane was still like his I would be holding it down too!!