- Location
- Retired in Minneapolis
Hi Jim,
That's the same setup that I've used for quite a while.
YOu found out why I put the small tab on the lower biner. It keeps the Rocker up on the top of the biner. Nothing fancy, just a U-shaped piece of metal taped to the biner. To keep the metal from chewing on the Rocker I slipped a piece of plastic tubing over the top.
What I was saying about connecting the Rocker and MC to seperate biners is that would be a true backup or parallel system. As it is, if the lower biner fails, both systems fail. When I worked through the redundancy I felt that adding two seperate biners made the system more complex by adding more gear. The chance of the lower biner failing is less, to my thinking, than the possibility of two biners getting snaggled at the base of the systems.
There is a diversion point when safety and backups can become hazards themselves. When that point is reached we need to stop and consider whether this is the road we should travel. If we need to add so many layers of protection in order to do a job, maybe we either need to consider not doing the job or come up with another procedure.
You wrote:
I'm still leaning toward using a hitch, maybe with a knot tender (small carabiner) running from the cord the microcender is attached to, then around my climbing line just under my hitch. As I move the microcender up, the hitch should slide up the line also and be in a better position to grab then if it were trailing down my line.
When you build that system be sure to post a picture.
That's the same setup that I've used for quite a while.
YOu found out why I put the small tab on the lower biner. It keeps the Rocker up on the top of the biner. Nothing fancy, just a U-shaped piece of metal taped to the biner. To keep the metal from chewing on the Rocker I slipped a piece of plastic tubing over the top.
What I was saying about connecting the Rocker and MC to seperate biners is that would be a true backup or parallel system. As it is, if the lower biner fails, both systems fail. When I worked through the redundancy I felt that adding two seperate biners made the system more complex by adding more gear. The chance of the lower biner failing is less, to my thinking, than the possibility of two biners getting snaggled at the base of the systems.
There is a diversion point when safety and backups can become hazards themselves. When that point is reached we need to stop and consider whether this is the road we should travel. If we need to add so many layers of protection in order to do a job, maybe we either need to consider not doing the job or come up with another procedure.
You wrote:
I'm still leaning toward using a hitch, maybe with a knot tender (small carabiner) running from the cord the microcender is attached to, then around my climbing line just under my hitch. As I move the microcender up, the hitch should slide up the line also and be in a better position to grab then if it were trailing down my line.
When you build that system be sure to post a picture.