Nothing can be said about a new saddle's design until one wears and works it. I certainly believe it would be more comfortable than my Weaver Sliding D, but then at my age and experience, I still find climbing BCMA's using an ECHO or a neurosurgeon wearing Payless shoes. I'm Stihl and chance nothing less.
The best saddle I ever wore was made by a harness stitcher in San Antonio, all leather and my attachment point was a perfect 50/50 upper/lower body placement, allowing me abilities no other tree climber could copy but it soaked-up sweat and became brittle in 3 months, another lasted the same.
Each of us is different, much like the bluejeans sold everywhere that will never fit right...I have a tall upper body and short stubby legs, no butt and my pants work their way down when I stuff my pockets with coins. The Sliding D sucks on any position except upright and ascending yet I adapted to it, trust it enough to concentrate on the work. Knowing that each person has genetic or influenced distribution of fatty tissues or musculature different from all others, this saddle promoted holds promise that may or may not fit me like a glove and drive like a Jaguar but I'm anxious to try it before I call it just another expensive addition to the many toys out there. If one hour a day more than I can work as it is now, with standard regulated pain making the quitting hour earlier, a few days of comfort and efficiency makes the retail price meaningless to me, just like the Stihl 200T.
Looking forward to trying one on.