Stihl MS-241 (pro$) or Stihl MS-201 (farm$$$)

I WAS looking for a top handle saw for light ground work of limbing and trimming brush, vines, shrubs and small trees. However, thanks to the expertise on this site I have been steered clear of using a T handle for such work.

So I've been researching the lightest and nicest rear handle saw I can find. Planned use are same as above: brush thinning, branch cutting, ground work. I'd really like to stick with Stihl because...it's a STIHL. Never had one and this will hopefully be a one time, long term purchase. BTW I tend to be tough on equipment, even just as a home owner. I always put things away clean and tidy and very orderly. And I'll maintain the saw as per or better than manufacturer suggestions. I just tend to be rough when working and getting after it. Onto the saws:

I REALLY like the MS-201 C-EM for it's light weight and features. It has a metal bumper spike, metal chain catcher, and M tronic engine. Supposedly this model has been improved since the first 201's came out. Only problem is that the price tag for this "farm and ranch" saw is in the $700 range.

The MS-241 C-M has all the same features as the 201, but it is over a pound heavier. It does have more power and costs about $150 less from what I can tell. But I really don't need the extra power for what I need to do with the saw. The real difference and my quest to find the perfect saw is all in the weight savings.

My main question here is what else would I be getting with a "pro" saw in the 241? I've heard things like the pro saws have titanium stators and can be rebuilt much easier. So why is it cheaper that the 201?

Lastly, still on the list is a MS 193 C-E. It is the lightest and cheapest price out of all. It has no metal bumper spike or steel chain catcher; all that stuff is plastic. No M tronic either. I really like the $400 price tag, but the power of the 193 is not even hitting 1.8 bhp. Will I want more should I ever need to buck a whole tree after a storm?
 
Don't get caught up in spending money buying a saw for your worst-case-scenario. Buy your first saw being mindful of what will be appropriate for your "most-often-encountered-scenario".

You should find an EPA tag on the engine housing of any modern saw which, among other details, states in hours the expected service life of the machine. Homeowner grade machines may have an expected service life of as few as 40 hours, whereas pro grade machines will have service lives expressed in hundreds of hours.

It's your money and you can spend as much as you want for a well-marketed name, but you may well find more than adequate service for much less of an outlay from other manufacturers like Echo (with a 5 year homeowner warranty).

Also bear in mind that top handle saws aren't meant for ground work. They're specifically designed for use at height. If you're going to be working on the ground, get a proper ground saw.
 
I haven't used the rear handle version of either the 201 or 193, but I can tell you that the 241 is a mean little saw, and can be gently modded to good effect. It's my favorite saw to train someone on, and it would be the first saw I'd pick up on the ground for smaller jobs. I've moved to the 150t for my main climbing saw, in part to force me to use bigger saws earlier on removals, so it's getting used more in the tree, too. I'd be happy with 150, 241, and 362 or 562 (husqy) as my lineup for anything that doesn't require the big guns.

Sure, it's heavier than the 201, but it's still light as a feather, and probably a better choice if you're going to be cutting firewood or felling trees. I am forever after my crew to not beat on the climbing saws by making big cuts with them on the ground...and because they shouldn't be using top-handles on the ground. I think for the money, if you keep it sharp, a 241 with a 16" bar will make you very happy.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom