Sep 3, 2016 #1 Newse Neus Location Milwaukee Why is the 9/16th short fid shorter than a 1/2 short fid? Is this a typo?
Sep 4, 2016 #2 C cliff_h Location North Carolina No, my Samson aluminum 1/2" & 9/16" short FID length measurements match the table.
Sep 4, 2016 #3 Newse Neus Location Milwaukee Crazy, I didn't think it was an error. I'm just curious why the larger diameter is shorter not longer.
Crazy, I didn't think it was an error. I'm just curious why the larger diameter is shorter not longer.
Sep 10, 2016 #4 Ragnar Participating member Location Texas They sort of explain the math here. Top right of page 2. Short fid for 1/4"-1/2" is 37.5% of a fid. Short fid for 9/16"-3/4" is 30% of a fid. http://www.samsonrope.com/Documents/Splice Instructions/Tools Required for Splicing_SEPT2012_WEB.pdf
They sort of explain the math here. Top right of page 2. Short fid for 1/4"-1/2" is 37.5% of a fid. Short fid for 9/16"-3/4" is 30% of a fid. http://www.samsonrope.com/Documents/Splice Instructions/Tools Required for Splicing_SEPT2012_WEB.pdf
Sep 11, 2016 #5 Brocky Been here much more than a while Location Michigan Interesting,never noticed that before. So larger diameter ropes squeeze better than smaller. And for some reason the cutoff point between the two is 1/2 and 9/16.
Interesting,never noticed that before. So larger diameter ropes squeeze better than smaller. And for some reason the cutoff point between the two is 1/2 and 9/16.