Kiwi,
I don't feel that having a friction hitch above the upper ascender is a safe arrangement. There are MUCH safer and more fool proof systems that are actually backups.
My opinion does run counter to accepted arbo practices I know.
Having a chest ascender or even a micrograb attached to your bridge is a MUCH safer setup.
There are so many things that can go wrong with a hitch being pushed up by an ascender. In order to have the hitch run smooth it has to be left a little loose. What happens if the ascender fails and the hitch is loose too? Ground fall or at least a slip/drop. If the hitch is attached to a biner through the upper eye of the ascender then the two are not really backing each other up. In order to have proper backups the chain of connection starts at the rope and goes to the harness. Two separate paths.
There's no arguing, using the hitch above the ascender is convenient...but is it safe? I don't think so. If you read about backups that are accepted in any other working rope profession they would not accept a system like this. In all of my reading on backups they are two separate systems.
Using a handled ascender for an upper, clip a biner through the top eye to capture the rope, attach your foot stirrup to the upper ascender not the bottom hole in the ascender. then, make a sling/tether to connect the upper biner to your harness. One attachment finished.
There are many ways to setup a lower attachment. Chest ascender is probably the best. Attaching a chest ascender to most harnesses is a chore. There aren't proper attachment points. I know some climbers who will tie a hitch with a slack tender to their bridge like a typical split tail as a lower attachment.
Look at:
http://storrick.cnchost.com/VerticalDevicesPage/VerticalHome.shtml
and pick out a 'Type 1 lever cam ascender' for a lower.