Notch Stainless Steel Portawrap - Updated

I’ve got a buckingham powder coated, and the larger RC drum…. Never had issues with either. I’ve never used one of the Notch brands, I’ve held one at a trade show. The only difference I could see was the gauge steel they used was noticeably thinner. That drum acts like a heat sink. Is it possible that the extra heat created is adding to the friction? (or visa versa?) IDK, but it definitely is not fun (and it’s dangerous) when you need something to run, and it doesn’t…

Edit: then again if it’s not “running” at all, my theory about the heat sink/friction is out…
 
Last edited:
Interesting. If this is the case I know a couple of groundies with a grilling on the way but I'll see
The best groundie on the crew should be the climber. How many wraps would you have taken on the pieces that locked up on you? If it was less, you should have voiced that. If it was the same, you can't really blame them unless they purposely didn't let it run. In which case get new groundies.
 
The best groundie on the crew should be the climber. How many wraps would you have taken on the pieces that locked up on you? If it was less, you should have voiced that. If it was the same, you can't really blame them unless they purposely didn't let it run. In which case get new groundies.
Right, like I said they followed instructions properly as far as I could tell. I just need to have a closer look at this thing while it's operating to see exactly what the issue is.
 
Best I can come up with is the bar stock/rod the eye is made out of might be larger diameter on the notch, possibly also the drum diameter and this could create a better (deeper?) Vee for the rope to wedge into and create a local higher friction point. With the real units to inspect personally you could see if this is so. Basic metal type ought not to account for the difference IMO. Curious to know what you find out.
 
Best I can come up with is the bar stock/rod the eye is made out of might be larger diameter on the notch, possibly also the drum diameter and this could create a better (deeper?) Vee for the rope to wedge into and create a local higher friction point. With the real units to inspect personally you could see if this is so. Basic metal type ought not to account for the difference IMO. Curious to know what you find out.
Good points, that's sort of what I'm expecting to be the issue
 
You need to use each different piece of gear differently.

If this has more bite, use less wraps. Not the device's fault.

The first video could have fallen off the extra 1/2 wrap.

Last week, any wrap was too much with a rigging ring up top, for what the climber was cutting.

I clipped a biner to the top of the POW as a redirect with friction. Still too much at times.



You don't have a way to measure your input force on the POW.

You didn't measure the load and impact force.

Seems like operator error.
 
POW has more of a tendency to need heavier pieces, or a running start to work well I’ve found. I like the RC 2000, for whatever reason you can get a more finite amount of friction allowing smaller pieces to “run”.
 
You need to use each different piece of gear differently.

If this has more bite, use less wraps. Not the device's fault.

The first video could have fallen off the extra 1/2 wrap.

Last week, any wrap was too much with a rigging ring up top, for what the climber was cutting.

I clipped a biner to the top of the POW as a redirect with friction. Still too much at times.



You don't have a way to measure your input force on the POW.

You didn't measure the load and impact force.

Seems like operator error.
Appreciate the feedback
 

New threads New posts

Kask Stihl NORTHEASTERN Arborists Wesspur TreeStuff.com Teufelberger Westminster X-Rigging Teufelberger
Back
Top Bottom