No more 'War on terror'

Re: No more \'War on terror\'

Obama vs. Obama.




I hope he fails miserably so that in 8 years we can all see how much of a commie/socialist/scumbag he is just like you do, BB.


Let's keep adding up the reasons why we hate him, and maybe then we can gather enough support from grassroots efforts to impeach him and get him the hell out of office.

Then, we can set up a new governing system. One where we never have to spend any money on anything, or debate about anything. Things will just go smoothly by themselves.

After all, why on Earth would we want someone with the middle name "Hussein" being President of the U.S. anyway? I mean, it doesn't matter that he won in the most convincing presidential election in the last decade, and that he actually does have a mandate.

None of that matters because of how much he hates all of us. Hates us down to our core. Hates the American way of life, wants to turn us all into freedom hating, Allah-worshipping terrorists.


Yes, I now hate President Obama, and to think, it only took this thread one page to bring me to this conclusion.


I will be outside scraping off my Obama sticker from my car if you need me. After that, I will be putting together a scrapbook of all of the fun times I have had watching Hannity on TV, and mailing it to him, and when he doesn't respond, I will go to the Fox News studios and wait for him in some God-forsaken corner of the parking lot and let him know that he guides my fear, and without him, I wouldn't know who to be deathly afraid of, or who to hate.

God Bless America! God don't bless Obama, for he is a commie and a socialist and a muslim, and a terrorist.


SZ
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

[ QUOTE ]
I mean, it doesn't matter that he won in the most convincing presidential election in the last decade

[/ QUOTE ]

Would he of won if they had a diff person running? I recall a Howard Stern show where they went to Brooklyn, asked how peeps felt about Obama's veiws. The thing was they used all McCaine issues and veiws. And uummm the NAACP's where saying ooo yes Obama all the way. They didn't even know the diff except that he was colored.

This brings you to the point did he win just cuase of his color? With a slight favor of white votes. Did he really win cuase he is the better man? It's no surprize that all the NAACP's of america voted for him no matter what. When I watch the enageration, I could of swore I was watching the million man march all over.
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I mean, it doesn't matter that he won in the most convincing presidential election in the last decade

[/ QUOTE ]

Would he of won if they had a diff person running? I recall a Howard Stern show where they went to Brooklyn, asked how peeps felt about Obama's veiws. The thing was they used all McCaine issues and veiws. And uummm the NAACP's where saying ooo yes Obama all the way. They didn't even know the diff except that he was colored.

This brings you to the point did he win just cuase of his color? With a slight favor of white votes. Did he really win cuase he is the better man? It's no surprize that all the NAACP's of america voted for him no matter what. When I watch the enageration, I could of swore I was watching the million man march all over.

[/ QUOTE ]







Actually, the whole "savior" thing was what motivated my vote.

And, I don't think it's "PC" to say "colored" in todays America.
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

Quit posting claims that are based on neocon fantasy. It taints everything you express.

I've just refuted every claim you made, but your style of response refuses to acknowledge them, instead you go on like a Limbaugh broken-record, attacking the messenger. Classic Cheneyesque rockhead Palin-type bridge-to-nowhere Russia-spotting, you-betcha.

There will be no forgetting Bush for right now, as he caused this mess Obama has to fix.
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

Geeze Easy!

Haven't seen you this fired up in a long time!

You leave the bumper sticker alone, really. Obama bumper stickers don't bother me.

And, the "MEDIA" always makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside. Aint it crazy how they can do that?

4 years, that's what he has, Obama and the dems have a lot to lose if we fail.

I sense a Ronald Reagan type comin down the pike.
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

[ QUOTE ]
Quit posting claims that are based on neocon fantasy. It taints everything you express.

I've just refuted every claim you made, but your style of response refuses to acknowledge them, instead you go on like a Limbaugh broken-record, attacking the messenger. Classic Cheneyesque rockhead Palin-type bridge-to-nowhere Russia-spotting, you-betcha.

There will be no forgetting Bush for right now, as he caused this mess Obama has to fix.

[/ QUOTE ]



Vanilla or Chocolate?
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

[ QUOTE ]
Quit posting claims that are based on neocon fantasy. It taints everything you express.

I've just refuted every claim you made, but your style of response refuses to acknowledge them, instead you go on like a Limbaugh broken-record, attacking the messenger. Classic Cheneyesque rockhead Palin-type bridge-to-nowhere Russia-spotting, you-betcha.

There will be no forgetting Bush for right now, as he caused this mess Obama has to fix.

[/ QUOTE ]
 

Attachments

  • 159580-crazy.webp
    159580-crazy.webp
    9.9 KB · Views: 14
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

Hey BB,
I dig what you say about government being wasteful. It is a system that needs to be more efficient. That being said, what nation(past or present) would be a good example of libertarian ideology.
As far as taking things out of govt. hands, what would happen if the federal govt. privatized cash production. Imagine if the govt had to buy cash from a private entity at a cost greater than the face value of said cash. This would be bad right?
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

[ QUOTE ]
Quit posting claims that are based on neocon fantasy. It taints everything you express.

I've just refuted every claim you made, but your style of response refuses to acknowledge them, instead you go on like a Limbaugh broken-record, attacking the messenger. Classic Cheneyesque rockhead Palin-type bridge-to-nowhere Russia-spotting, you-betcha.

There will be no forgetting Bush for right now, as he caused this mess Obama has to fix.

[/ QUOTE ]

Let 'em have it Oak!
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

[ QUOTE ]
There will be no forgetting Bush for right now, as he caused this mess Obama has to fix.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well riddle man we'll see if Chocolate can fix anything, I know it works for my kids when they get a bobo.

[ QUOTE ]
Quit posting claims that are based on neocon fantasy

[/ QUOTE ]

What fantasy brain frat? do you not understand facts? The Howard Stern show really happened. The simple fact that more (I'll just use ?? cuase seems anything you call them now adays is wrong, yet job apps ask cuac or colored, grow up) ?? voted this year than ever before. Then with a trick like Howard does shows how blind, racist, dare I say stupid the voters where this year. The fact that a voter has just agreeded with all Mccaines veiws and still votes Obama prove all the above said.

[ QUOTE ]
And, I don't think it's "PC" to say "colored" in todays America

[/ QUOTE ]

Well what word do we use? God knows I want to be 100% PC.
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

WOW!! Uh just for the record!! Obama does NOT have a mandate!! where the heck did that come from What percentage of the popular vote did he win?! 52% is not a mandate Dude!
I actually do not understand why we argue? no one is going to argue the other person to their point of view!! What we should do as a fundemental change to this thread is for each person to clearly state what their position is for the sake of clarity and understanding and why?!remember there are a lot of gray areas !
Oh by the way why does the right get acused of fear mongering and scare tactics and yet we are all gonna be under water in five years from the ice caps melting? or maybe freezing???!! check this out from 1974. Why do we all always by hyped up BS.
Do we ever read history?
AIDhttp://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,944914,00.htmlS remember that.
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

The mention of the Black Panther party, inferring McCain/Palin people were frightened from the polls and voting, from their mere presense, implicates fear. A sorry excuse for the simple fact McSame/Palin lost and more so, a fantasy based on perception that black people scare the white folk, which were prepared to vote for McSame because he's white but were too scared to do it.

Even if it were true, and it's not because there is no Black Panther Party anymore, it answers the accusations I made regarding right-wing tactics of fear, which create division. Iraq and 9/11 notwithstanding. Saddam's ability to toss nuclear-armed warheads at us in as short a time as .45 minutes, his stockpiles of VX, anthrax, and Al Qeada legions, all trained from his programs of terror.

It was fear that Cheney and Rove used to subjegate the entire "with us or against us" world. It was costly too, needless to mention. For that, the price of stability and repair, rescue and jobs back, peace once again and hope?
I wish the entire price tag comes from garnishments on the right's eight years' worth of offshore tax-free deposits, the windfalls, the portfolios and investments made from the spilled blood of the thousands and many more yet to come.

The right has to employ fear, for as evidenced by Nixon, Reagan, and the whole Bush bunch, they can not win what they want any other way. I happen to like both chocolate AND vanilla ice cream but have to say, vanilla's so ordinary and boring, kind of bland with no excitement or substance...unless you add some fruity colours.

Obama, like I mantained before, could be a Commie trans-sexual w/ AIDS with leprosy and a drug habit and worships witchs but the task he was elected to perform is item number one with a fresh start on a system that can not incorporate ANY of the allowances that let it get the way it is now. Change, he meant it and so did the overwhelming majority (in spite of Ohio, Indiana, Michigan and Florida GOP voter fraud) who voted for IT, not necessarily for him.

Palin is a whole 'nuther embarrassment. Shame on the GOP for even considering such offensive idiocy to the intelligence of the American people...or the world.
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

[ QUOTE ]
black people scare the white folk

[/ QUOTE ]

LMAO this guy lives in a fantasy world. No one said anything about fear. You might live in fear of the Carthaginians but most cuac americans don't.

I'll spell it out for you "The Carthaginians out number the cuac"

And this election proved it 100%
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

I can understand it, when I was 3 the clowns at Ringling Bros. Circus scared me.

Glad they weren't hanging around at the polls last November, I might've voted for Palin.
 
Re: No more \'War on terror\'

Sorry about the link!! I have been messing with it for a while and cannot get it straight! If you google time magazine global cooling you will get it! it is essentially an article in 1974 talking about the man made effects of global cooling and how the ice caps are thickening etc!! it is nuts to read it!!
I agree about the fear mongering!! we the people need to just chillax and not by into every freakin scare tactic.Just like the "stimulus bill" it is crap!! the government is telling us it must be done swiftly and boldly to save the economy?? I am simply saying "I do not buy it " SORRY!! that is what the last administration said about the 750billion bailout!! that was gonna fix things? what happened? if this gets passed and then does not work then what!!? will they come back for more!!? They need to get responsible with our money I would love to see someone argue that statement!!!
This is not change ,at least not yet anyhow!! this is typical Washington bull crap I dont care if its Obama or Bush Its the friggin same!!!WRONG!
Call your representatives in DC and tell them ENOUGH!!
Be a problem solver!
crazy.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom