Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for a practical question. Not at this time. I'll see how things go but I don't have the stock to offer both.I have a practical question. Is there an opportunity to purchase just a swingarm so that a person can have both versions of the swimgarm if they want?
Thanks for that blast from the past. Again, post #23 above I think there is confusion. And with total appreciation to @Brocky and Jesse at the Charlotte AR training, this knot does not have the Knut attribute. The bight lays flat against the climbing line and then is modified by going directly to the eye of the Dogbone.The hitch you have pictured I think is something you referred to as the Knut H in the following video, you start tying it at about the 39:00 mark.
That may seem like a small thing to many but not to me! Good job Richard.This is one of the small safety related improvements of the Swing Arm.
This Link with time stamp should take you right to the spot in the video.
@Brocky, you are an awesome artist and hitch creator. But IMO neither of the above drawings represent a Knut. Would you please draw a Knut. I have linked a video and there are many others on how it is tied.View attachment 80736The feature I found unique about the Knut is the inactive aspect of the eye and leg that comes directly from the top. It becomes slightly active when it crosses sides, but still does basically nothing to form the rest of the hitch. The A-H and other variations have this same feature with the other eye doing all the work.
Following alphabet labeling above shows the difference between the two hitches.
Just added/edited #34 above.Maybe I am confused but you yourself called this a Knut H in the video I linked. I don't care who calls what who or why or when, but for the sake of consistency and clarity, you called this a Knut H. Was that a verbal typo or have you changed your personal nomenclature for some technical reasons? I've been calling it the Knut H because I learned the hitch and name from your video. I don't want to beat a dead horse but this one is still whinnying a little hahaha
So tell me what you want me to call the hitch that Jesse tied at the Charlotte Training session and he called the Catalan and that you modified with the straight leg? (other than anything Knut because it does NOT have that form factor and is not tied in anyway like the Knut)Ok, it’s not the Knut, full name of mine is the Knut Variation H, with some before it and after it called Knut Variations, based on my what I think is the most recognizable feature of the Knut. Since I am originating these shouldn’t I be given credit, calling it by another name doesn’t do that.
I have posted some dimensions that may be helpful. My personal preference, and it sounds like I'm selling more product, but I have the captive eye on my bridge and it mostly stays on my bridge while I move my life support anchor to desired locations and then work off of that. For the secondary life support anchor I use the non-captive eye with a SwivaEye carabiner.![]()
Looks like the swing arm without the eye will fit the Camp gyro swival with the rubber gourmets removed.
Awesom ZK,Hello All (and Richard),
My HitchHikerXF arrived today. What a hip piece of gear. I've only had the chance to connect to a rope in the garage and hang...but it looks like the perfect balance of traditional confidence makers like a rope hitch, with the modern day technology of the Dog Bone/SlicPin combo. Oh...did I mention the technical prowess integrated into the housing?
The ability to transition from DRT to SRT couldn't be better. And the swing arm design moving an anchoring knot away from the rope hitch clearly comes from someone who climbs. A most excellent solution.
I'm looking forward to playing in the canopy, and getting to know the HitchHikerXF.
Well worth the wait!
Thank you.
I'm very reluctant to comment on this but it haunts me not to, so please take no offence, I realize there are conceptual ideas here but others look at things and may not know the risk. I have seen comments in forms end up in court cases. Because I started this thread about the HHxf and this is posted here I am compelled to say something. Other opinions are always welcome.View attachment 80724No, another angle and better lighting.
Thank you for the clarification.View attachment 80805Only rope to rope contact is the hitch, here 1/2” pipe, painted, didn’t last long, takes the place of slic pin, dog bone, or carabiner. Bushings also work nice.
Seems like a life support connection to the hitch would make the friction body a non-life support accessory????View attachment 80805Only rope to rope contact is the hitch, here 1/2” pipe, painted, didn’t last long, takes the place of slic pin, dog bone, or carabiner. Bushings also work nice.
I'm not certain I understand your comment.Seems like a life support connection to the hitch would make the friction body a non-life support accessory????