[ QUOTE ]
It slipped during testing. I wanted to see how it would perform with the bury in the 'pull', not choked.
[/ QUOTE ] Aha, you have not turned my world upside down after all. Yes, they definitely slip if not choked. Didn't Yale stop making loopies for sale because they realized they are dangerous if used the way you tested yours?
[ QUOTE ]
If so did you measure any slipage on the bury? Also, what strength loss/increase can be measured between that of a loopie, a spliced loop, whoopie sling, and the breaking strength of the rope in a straight pull?
[/ QUOTE ]
I have done a lot of testing on these very questions. The last 3 questions have easy answers. A spliced loop is as strong as the rope. The loopie and whoopie lose about 10% of their strength at the spot where the adjuster tail emerges from the cover. At that point the cover is under full tension, but it also has a big hole in it where the tail comes out. Obviously that has to weaken the rope, and I have measured it a couple of times at very close to 10%.
The question about the choked bury on the loopie is much trickier. All my tests were done over a 3/4-inch steel pin, perhaps a bit smaller than the radius in a normal arborist application. On the other hand, the sling itself was set up for a straight pull, not wrapped around a stem as it normally would be. All things considered, I think my experimental setups were much more challenging for the sling slippage wise than an arborist setup. [Edit and correction: the question of slippage in a straight pull is complicated. Even when properly choked they can sometimes be made to slip completely apart. See
Loopie Thread for a long discussion of this very issue.]
So I don't have a definitive answer as to what it takes to get a choked loopie to slip. But if the question is can a loopie with a 1-fid length bury wrapped around a stem and properly choked slip, then I am quite sure the answer is no.