[ QUOTE ]
If you get that kind of cover excess, it would seem that either the rope came out of the factory unbalanced, or someone messed with the rope since then. ...
Brion Toss
[/ QUOTE ]
Brion- I, and everyone else on this message board, wish this were really true! This is a case where different worlds collide
The way we use our rope- with friction hitches that grab the rope, pinch down on it, then get pulled with weight on it while sliding, it has the effect of milking almost every line ever made (there are a few lucky exceptions).
Our double braid climbing lines (Blaze, Velocity, Poison Ivy, etc) ARE designed as described- but in use we have to milk the cover a few times (usually accomplished by climbing on the rope) before it will be "truly" balanced.
When you look at how rope is designed, this sounds like I'm making it up- but when you look at how us silly tree guys actually use the rope, it makes sense.
I haven't tested breaking strengths of milked vs. non milked ropes, but it would be my guess that the milked would be stronger. When you milk a rope, you are straightening out the fibers and straighter fibers, in general, yield a higher breaking strength.
It is all moot, in my opinion, however. What is important is that you milk the cover so that in use it is perfect. When it comes to climbing line, it is not ultimate breaking strength that you should be concerned about. You should be concerned about its day to day performance.
love
nick