John Ball brought up an interesting piece of information that he and Shane have gleened from the accident statistics.
They found that there was a bit higher accident rate in companies that did training. That made them ponder for a while. It didn't make sense at first. Then they concluded that just because someone is training doesn't mean that:
1-they know all of the information about the topic
2-the instructor can get all of that information to the student
3-when it comes time for this student to teach, how can they get ALL of what they learned transferred.
Every time there is a teacher/student relationship we hope that the teacher has 100% of the knowledge on the subject. At best, the student will be able to absorb about 20% of what is taught. More can be absorbed but it requires that the student to more studying. So...then that student takes the 20%, which becomes the 100% that they're trying to teach. The next generation of students is getting pretty thin soup. The second generation student might be lucky enough to absorb about 4% of what the original teacher was teaching.
Don't take this as a slam against AM. They do a fine job. But this is not a great way to setup a training system.
After taking my FA/CPR courses I had to take an Instructor training class from the Red Cross. We were given skills tests at the beginning of the class. Then we had to put together lesson plans and teach to the people in the class.