CEO murder... somethings not right

I’m giving the narrative a chance. If it’s accurate dude was noble in keeping the gun and evidence, if he was caught in the act he would likely have been killed by law enforcement on the spot.

Was his intent to make a statement starting the conversation overnight? Or just simply revenge? Or was this a political assassination? We will likely never know. Did y’all see the news interview infront of the prison where he was being held? That was oddly powerful.

Remember dude hasn’t been tried yet, so theoretically he’s innocent at this point. I know a young person caring for his Mama, she’s 100% dependent on oxygen and insurance gave her a cheap ass portable concentrator that barely works. She’s terrified to leave the house because the machine is so bad. I had to take her to the hospital when he had an accident, and the doctors there even couldn’t get the machine right and had to hook her up to their in house O2.

SOMEONE, denied the more expensive uni with the push of a few buttons on the screen.

Should that someone be shot? No, but what is the solution when there is no accountability?

Another good friend was recently diagnosed with an aggressive treatable cancer with a few 2-3 months of life without treatment. Insurance denied the modern treatment which would give her a 70% chance of survival at 5years, instead they approved the treatment which has about a 30% chance…. Yet they needed a series of tests and procedures, the insurance company refused to fast track this and spaces out the tests over the next 6 months! This is before any chemo!

Thankfully, a mutual friend is a retired investigative journalist. Some how tracked down the CEO’s personal cell number, and gave him a call interrupting his Sunday family dinner. I’m sure there were threats or exposure of this corrupt treatment, but I don’t know what was said. Magically our friend got a call from their doctor the next morning. All tests were approved on an appropriate schedule, along with the most effective treatments.
That was around July.

Sometimes morality/empathy conflicts with what is ‘right and wrong’. This is the greater point of the conversation. Ignoring conspiracies BinLauden had a hit reward issued by our government and was assassinated outside due process, where is the outrage?

A terrorism charge for a single targeted shooting? Get fucked. It's the elites who are the terror.
Agreed, it’s the elites who press charges, and they are scared. Thus they are afraid to continue fucking people over.
I saw a graph of income division in the US now, and France in the late 1700’s..
 
Thank you. :LOL:

That's literally the percent of 18-29 year olds who believe killing that CEO was acceptable. That's a fucking psychopathic thing to believe, at least to my generation.

Young Voters (Ages 18-29): An Emerson College poll indicates that 41% of voters in this age group perceive the killing as somewhat or completely acceptable, while 19% remain neutral.
How many people in your generation believe turning gaza into a parking lot is acceptable?
 
How is that a dumb fucking statement when Mike is citing a study where 41% of the young people polled agreed with it? He can't make a comment based upon information?
That study didn’t say 41% of young people are psychopaths, that’s what makes it a dumb statement. Labeling an age group as dipshits is also a dumb comment, that doesn’t serve anyone.
 
"And they've been trained to feel that way."

Yep, they've been trained to feel that way...by a constant barrage of hyperbole. 13 unarmed blacks shot by police in a year out of 2,300,000 black arrests is tragic but hardly an epidemic. It's something to improve on through training.

Fuck anyone who tries to justify murder of this CEO. Regardless of of how it makes you feel, it's unacceptable.
Blacks being arrested at rates 3-5 times higher than whites is fucking unacceptable.

Watching 3 cops slowly take the life of a handcuffed George Floyd was fucking unacceptable.
 
united health has the highest claim denial rate in the industry and Brian Thompson led the push to increase it further. He oversaw a company that used AI to process claims that had a 90% error rate and they only ceased using this software when they were sued. Thousands of people have died because they did not receive care from their provider, United Health. Brian Thompson was a mass murderer. We need to reframe our notion of violence from just individual acts to large scale systems that do exponentially more harm. I feel this an act of an individual who felt helpless to do anything in the face of these huge corporations through diplomacy, in most empires that have fallen, it is usually due to the masses rising up against the corrupt and wealthy at the top, this is a tale as old as time, people are getting desperate and it's going to get worse until there is actual legit change.
 
united health has the highest claim denial rate in the industry and Brian Thompson led the push to increase it further. He oversaw a company that used AI to process claims that had a 90% error rate and they only ceased using this software when they were sued. Thousands of people have died because they did not receive care from their provider, United Health. Brian Thompson was a mass murderer. We need to reframe our notion of violence from just individual acts to large scale systems that do exponentially more harm. I feel this an act of an individual who felt helpless to do anything in the face of these huge corporations through diplomacy, in most empires that have fallen, it is usually due to the masses rising up against the corrupt and wealthy at the top, this is a tale as old as time, people are getting desperate and it's going to get worse until there is actual legit change.
Exactly. I’d like to see a system that holds Brian Tompson’s accountable to protect others from illegally taking justice into their own hands from helplessness. Unfortunately, look at the lack of empathy and list of charges making this Luigi an example. Hence the terrorism charges.

Hopefully the courts will see the desperate move of throwing charges out to see what will stick for what it is.
 
Hopefully the courts will see the desperate move of throwing charges out to see what will stick for what it is.
I'm surprised no one has exacted revenge on a DA by now... they care nothing about innocence. They just want to pump the numbers on conviction rate. There's a young man doing 10 years for a crime he didn't commit. There was no physical evidence. The only witness was a video of a 4 year old who's story didn't make sense, being interviewed by a child advocacy center working with the police.

Girl claimed there was full penile penetration. Pelvic exam showed no abnormalities. I talked to an expert who said prepubescent will show scarring for months, much more so a 4 year old. DA tricked the dumb ass defense lawyer who had never defended a jury trial before into preventing the medical expert from testifying. The jury never heard that there was a pelvic exam that showed no abnormalities. That was the kid's case, 100 percent enough to establish reasonable doubt.


There was a lot more wrong with that case. I spelled it all out in a letter to the DA. They had to know he didn't do it. She was lying. There is absolutely no chance that what she said was all true. DA played games.

Being incarcerated as an innocent man is one of the worst feelings in the world. And the jails are loaded with them.
 
DAs can do whatever they want with complete impunity


No, a district attorney (DA) cannot be held responsible for false prosecution due to prosecutorial immunity. This judge-made doctrine protects prosecutors from lawsuits for actions related to their job, regardless of how egregious the behavior. This includes knowingly prosecuting an innocent person, withholding evidence, or fabricating false evidence.

The Supreme Court created prosecutorial immunity in 1976 to ensure the proper functioning of the criminal justice system and to serve the “public trust”. However, some say that this immunity allows prosecutors to disregard constitutional rights to pursue convictions.
 
I believe the death penalty is from the federal charges... what happened to double jeopardy?

He's getting charged twice for the same crime.. once in federal and once in state.

What is the dual sovereignty doctrine?

The dual sovereignty doctrine states that more than one sovereign may prosecute you, without violating the prohibition against double jeopardy, if you break the laws of each sovereignty. Since the states are considered separate sovereigns from the federal government, each sovereign can charge you without violating double jeopardy.

So, for example, Officers of the Los Angeles Police Department, were tried and found not guilty of assault on Rodney King in Ventura County Superior Court in 1991.

Some of those same officers, though, were later charged and convicted in federal court for violating Rodney King’s civil rights.

The federal charges and convictions arose out of the same incident as the previous state case in Ventura County Superior Court. However, because the state of California and the federal government are separate sovereigns, double jeopardy did not bar the prosecution of those officers in federal court.


 

Mentions Luigi at about 25 minutes...

My bf from hs is a family doctor... he says the health insurance companies are organized crime... and then says... that's not a euphemism... it really is organized crime.
 
How many people in your generation believe turning gaza into a parking lot is acceptable?

"Tu quoque" won't help your case.

I know I hit a special nerve with the "generation" comment, but my argument stands on its own merit. Murder in the street because you aren't happy with healthcare is outrageous and should be condemned regardless of what is happening in Gaza.
 
"Tu quoque" won't help your case.

I know I hit a special nerve with the "generation" comment, but my argument stands on its own merit. Murder in the street because you aren't happy with healthcare is outrageous and should be condemned regardless of what is happening in Gaza.
The fact that it should be condemned, but isn't should tell you something about the state of the country and society at large. You're outraged at the breakdown of the moral fabric of society when the social fabric of the country is in tatters. People don't really give a damn about morality when they feel their basic needs aren't being met or they feel they're being treated unjustly.
 
Last edited:

Mentions Luigi at about 25 minutes...

My bf from hs is a family doctor... he says the health insurance companies are organized crime... and then says... that's not a euphemism... it really is organized crime.
I didn't watch the video, but I agree with your BF
 

New threads New posts

Kask Stihl NORTHEASTERN Arborists Wesspur TreeStuff.com Teufelberger Westminster X-Rigging Teufelberger
Back
Top Bottom