No sweat, I get 'em too.
I'm not judging this guy at all, but am a bit critical of his particular use and smug protrayel of his art.
Afterall, Nancy Reagan used a mystic before pressuring Ronald how to act on international affairs, millions consult the astrology charts before heavy decisions, and we still wonder about that black cat crossing our paths - or the number 13. Someone did cut those boulders 38 times and transport them a couple miles to place them exactly where they fit without electricity, cables, or horsepower of any kind, let alone our insistance that they had no command of physics or engineering to do it with. Machu Picchu stands testament that we have forgotten more than we think we know and anytime a doctor designates "a miracle has occured" shows that there are things we still are in need of recognizing.
On tree health I also don't understand many things, but use a wider perspective to visualize a root cause, the starting point of all treatments sans the chemical quick-fixes industry markets readily. This guy is using marketing techniques mastered by the chemical salesmen, refusing to divulge important elements of his work, and is a new player in a game where thousands of people are growing disrespectful for the failures of convention to fix our problems. If he plays his gig right, he'll make a killing making a living. So do the Imitrix and Advil and War on Terror contractors. No big deal.
It's just that if we question the conventions as much as we question the new comers (and new ager's), everyone might benefit.
