For me, a Swing Dutchman, uses both
>>hard early close on hard sideLean side w/Step Dutchman
>>strong Tapered Hinge to the 'Off Side' (Dent)
The thin side of Tapered Hinge is missing or sheared by the early side close, tho, perhaps to center or so.
.
Usually save that patch tho as anti-swing, to Tapered pull. Even if center punch Tapered, to reapportion those fibers to off side, generally purposefully maintain some hinge on lean side, at this most leveraged position.
But, in swing strategy, leave out that safety, and invoke high torque twist/throw.
.
The harder the side lean , the greater return from Step Dutchman or Tapered Hinge leveraged responses from increased inputs. Employing the Dutchman is not really meant to be a dainty thing. If got cohonos to slap step hard with speed, get advantage of speed squared helping. A Tapered Hinge changes common 'strip' hinge to offset side pulls with tension offset ballast , Step Dutchman is same strategy with compression.
In hard sideLean w/hard Step Dutchman and Tapered Hinge in concert, torquing to off side, w/o anti-swing stabilizer patch, can give hard swing, even wild. Kinda like 2 opposing twists on a bar/T-handle around a center (vs. 1 short pull) much harder torquing to point of more chance of over correction.
.
As long as correct mechanix at highest leveraged force points that define the movement, and no binds, can fairly triage what can be allowed in solid wood/up to the constitution of the tree as a container of forces.
.
After seeing what can plot and do, just increases arguments on to scrutinize for no accidental , especially full face , Dutchman's. To me Tapered Hinge is mainstay, even just to practice, has self adjusting ranges per side load, and few things perfectly centered etc. Even if so, use to make softer hit, not into lean etc. But always anti-swing tuft preserved, unless specifically unlocking that safety.