I sort of stepped back from this thread a few days back because I must not have expressed myself too clearly. But fool that I am, I'll try again.
I agree with Guy and probaby Sean as well, I don't think of G. applanatum or G. lucidum as being strongly agressive, in the sense of being perthotrophic, that is being able to kill living, otherwise healthy tree tissue. My earlier point about caution with northern European species rests in folks showing me G. adspersum with the strong conviction that it *is* a primary pathogen and a dominant one of concern . True, in Francis' book, he doesn't mention (not much, anyway) G. adspersum. But that is what concerned folks took time to show me on street trees in Belgium and Germany. I don't know what the real story is.
In the northeast US, G. tsugae on eastern hemlock is the species I come across most often and that does seem to move in and spread pretty readily but does seem to come in after root and butt injury. If we cut all the hemlocks with the red varnish conks, we wouldn't have too many standing hemlocks at the edges of the human community!
As for the medicine, folks grind the dried fruiting bodies of G. lucidum in a mortar and pestle and make an infusion or decoction of the powder. I don't think the other species are used in this manner. No idea as to dose!