Tree ownership? Or trespassing?

JontreeHI

Branched out member
Here's an interesting case I would love to get some opinions on.
The tree in question is (was) a beautiful monkey pod (Albizia saman, I beleive), obviously on the property belonging to my in-laws. For those without tropical experience, monkey pods are known for their sprawling, umbrella canopies comprised of several huge leads. Lots of fun to climb (see treesandsurf's hitch hiker video for a good example).
Maybe ten years ago, the neighbor to the rear of the property hired some ninjas to come in while in laws were on vacation and remove a significant percentage of the canopy, and also put in a wall, severing probably about 30 percent of the root crown. Then, about 7 years ago, my in laws hired some hacks to come in and "prune for health." Long story short, they removed several large leads, several of which were of 12-15 inch diameter, including stubbing off a major lead (final cut roughly 8 in diam.) which hangs over another, adjacent property.
Time lapse: monkey pods drop leaves every year and typically flush back again within 1-2 months. Two seasons ago, our tree went a full year with no green. We thought it was dead, laid some mulch and started hand watering. Since, we have seen spotty growth throughout the canopy, some sections appearing to have been completely rejuvenated, others leafless with significant die-back, and still others which are still leafless, but the wood is green. Close inspections reveals bumpy callouses at the nodes, and lots of ant frass. After discussing with a couple other arbs who have dealt with similar signs, it appears there are two fungi culprits whose names I can't think of right. Apparently systemic is the answer, and we are working towards that soon.
Enough background, here's the meat:
Before injection, my ground guy and I have been working to clear all the deadwood, including the massive stubbed-off lead (which sprouted years ago, but died back-the sprout/die back pattern has continued closer to the main stem every year, so my thought was to remove it entirely.)
This entire lead forks off from the main stem exactly at the property line. All of the logs, some 300-400 pounders, were swung onto our side and never touched down on the adjacent property. This has been our "slow week project" and we are about half way done with his lead.
Today, the neighbor, who had been on vacation in Alaska ( and is a maritime lawyer and a$$hole) came to the fence livid and essentially accused me of trespassing. He claims that he loves that branch, took offense to my calling it a "stub," and demands that all cutting be stopped immediately. Further, he states that although it is undoubtedly our tree, property boundaries extend straight up from the center of the earth, so that branch and anything else above his property belong to him.
So what do you think buzzers? Boundary law or tree ownership? I am a trespasser or a tree owner(well, my in laws) doing what I damn well please in our tree, for our tree?
I'd appreciate some perspective!
Jon
 
Thanks for your response. This is a different neighbor than the one who hired the ninjas. I wasn't very clear, but just used that example to illustrate the past stressors to the tree.
Kind of backwards-most disputes are 'neighbor wants tree gone, owner responsible.'
This is 'neighbor wants to retain tree, owner wants branch gone.'
So just to be clear, the neighbor in question hasn't wronged the tree, just wants to keep a dead stub.
Thanks!
 
Been to court over something similar. Laws will differ everywhere. But the basic norm is...If someone's tree parts cross your property line, it is your right to cut back to the line "as long as you don't harm the tree". Totally sounds like you have a case should it go to court, as the stub, if it were to remain, could harm the tree. Just gotta make sure it's worth the trouble and cost.

One thing to consider though; if you used his air space to remove the lead, he may well be able to go after you for that, thus giving him some leverage. The judge will always ask why the job wasn't discussed with the neighbor prior to starting work.

I'm no attorney, I've just researched the issue a little. Good luck with it. I love monkey pods, btw. Saw a beautiful one while driving through the Big Island at a cemetary. It was so big, I got my wife to turn the car around, and we checked it out. Got some good pics of it. Had a form very similar to a live oak.
 
Tom,
My dad says that too. But I'm not familiar with victor morello.
Thanks treelogic. It's interesting, it's our tree that occupies his air space. Sounds like a real grey area.
My bet is he would change his tune if a branch over his property failed and caused damage. Of course THEN it would our branch....
 
I've found the best way to deal with situations like that is to be polite, briefly explain your reasons and then walk away. You have nothing to worry about on your end, so don't let this guy make you second guess yourself. Trees seem to be a catalyst to unearth deeper issues that really have nothing to do with the trees at the end of the day.

Monkeypods are very tough, but loosing large sections of the canopy can significantly weaken them and predispose them to other issues, which it sounds like may have happened in this case. Unless you are very sure about the diagnosis (fungi?) I wouldn't do injection treatments. If you do go that route, what about a soil drench instead? I do trunk injections but don't like to promote unless it's a last ditch effort or there are no other effective options available.

jp
grin.gif
 
Hey Jon,
Not 100 percent on the diagnosis until I can get some samples into UH, but apparently Dudley and Steve Connolly both had dealt with what appears to be the same thing based on the swollen node thing. Steve had said he saw significant results with injection, but yea, I'd like to confirm it in this case before committing to going that route. I'd be interested to research soil drench more.
See you weds at Germaine's.
Thanks
Jon
 
[ QUOTE ]
...
So just to be clear, the neighbor in question hasn't wronged the tree, just wants to keep a dead stub.
Thanks!

[/ QUOTE ]

Hard to know what is going on without pics/graphics.
So far it sounds like the neighbor has a point.
didn't you say it was dying back, but the wood showed green?

Therefore it is not dead and i gotta wonder why you want to remove living tissue ahead of the tree's own schedule. Resources are translocating to other areas in the tree where they are needed--why take them away?
confused.gif


"the sprout/die back pattern has continued closer to the main stem every year, so my thought was to remove it entirely.)" Please think again--maybe speed your weeks up with work that has to be done. The "stubs are bad" concept in your nighttime reading material is overstated or overinterpreted for sure.

Monkeypods are nice an all but it'd be nicer if they planted other sp. on that island!
mad.gif
 
Thanks guy,
I have to figure out how to resize photo.
My thinking was that a non-photosynthetic log would just be an energy- and nutrient-suck for the rest of the tree. I could definitely be wrong.
Most of the logs we removed already were dead and dry. Your advice is to leave what remains and see what the tree will do with it?
Thanks I appreciate the comments.
Will work on resizing photos when I have a chance.
Jon
 
It is interesting that he made no complaints when the limb was initially reduced to the existing stub. What was done then? Was he sought out to give permission? There is the "Hawaii Rule" http://archives.starbulletin.com/content/20100310_Trees_owner_loses_right_to_overhanging_portions.

I think this is what the lawyer is referring to given his tact that his property line extends infinitely above ground and below. That may not be entirely true as there is a limit based on zoning laws and mineral rights.

In hindsight, this is one of those situations that may have been better dealt with by seeking the permission of the neighbor to access his space. However, it may be argued that his prior approval, tacit or explicit for the prior work would support you in completing the job based on your professional knowledge.

Time to either use diplomacy or an adversarial approach to deal with him.
 
If wood is dry then i agree in general it oughta come off. If you scratch it and it is green then it is photosynthesizing, but the key process to respect imo is translocation of resources, back to a line the tree can defend aka retrenchment aka collar-building.

10-4 with humper re knocking on the door before entering or affecting air space. Golden Rule?

Windows Paint is one easypeasy resizing helper. You'll be glad you did.
laugh.gif


O and Tom why was new rope a problem to the hangee? did it chafe their skin too much?
tongue.gif
 
Here's another try at the photo. The fence is the property line.
The guy has said he doesn't intend to take legal action as long as I don't cut any more. Fine.
True, it is his airspace, but say we wanted to remove our tree (we don't). I'm fairly sure he has no claim to 'his branch' or the rest of the tree.
Tree disputes are common in Hawaii, where one neighbor will cut back his neighbors tree to his property line, neighbor gets mad, un-neighborly things are said, and so on. He can cut what he wants on his property, as long as he can access it from his property. But I believe e can't retain it if we want it gone.
That being said, we are going to leave it alone for awhile.
Thanks everyone for the comments
Jon
 

Attachments

  • 365187-image.webp
    365187-image.webp
    93.9 KB · Views: 85
If you're removing the tree then it would be a matter of gaining permission to work in his space. But, seeing that he's lawyer and has an affinity for this limb then he may be a pain to deal with. Good luck in the future with this!
 
Good job on the pic; wasn't that hard was it?

Now more than ever I'd advise postponing the branch removal until stone dead and crumbling, or streaks of a voracious fungal pathogen are on the collar.

That collar should grow over time, so closure will be optimized by waiting. Some 'stubs' are good. gotta get beyond rules of thumb, and look at the whole hand you're dealt.

I remember a lawyer/neighbor once howled about rights to overhanging vegetation. I offered to help him...

get a refund from his law school, as his education was defective. He declined that generosity, in memorable language. the subject was not raised again.
 
Guy
I appreciate your perspective. Going to hold off, focus on the rest of the smaller deadwood, get zeroed in on the fungus, and treat that. It's an awesome tree, and the main thing is saving it if it can be saved. Even jerk neighbor and I are on the same page, even if he's trying to do it with wound dressings, indiscriminate application if inorganic fertilizer (his cure-all), and the 4 foot deep raised planter that covers almost his entire back yard and is now home to every kind of weed I can think of.
Ill stay out of his air space and hopefully he will stay out of mine.
Jon
 
Good luck Jon with the neighbor making hades on earth. If he's overferting, maybe inoculating/vertical mulching with compost etc. along the border will help buffer any potential root system burnout. might also speed codit on those whacked branches.

It's amazing trees survive at all given what humans do to them!
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom