Sweating More Purchase from a Line System

TheTreeSpyder

Branched out member
Location
Florida>>> USA
Rope length is a relative thang. Rope length is related to rope tension, elasticity, length to load etc. For example a system of a line tied off to a tree; then hand tightend and tied off to a stump as anchor with line hand tight has so much rope in it. If pulled tighter with a with a Z-rig, we don't necessarily move tree, but there is less rope in system for same job; because we have taken a purchase of some rope length to the slack side/ out of the tension or higher tension side (between stump anchor and tree).

Rope is a flexible device, so as common sense we multiply force with inline pulley pulls. Wood, a non-flexible device resists bending; so this resistance X length X angle gives leverage with non-inline force/ perpendicular direction of input; in contrast to inline input of rope/pulley/flexables. But, under tension load; suddenly rope kinda becomes a stiff/ non-flexable device; so the resistance to bending can now be used to highly leverage force(with angle and tension as multipliers, not length) like a wooden lever; with non-inline/perpendicular pull to rope. The friction that you usuallty fight in pulley systems, now becomes an ally to trap the higher line tension (by grabbing hold/ taking purchase of more rope to the lower tension side by a successive process of sweating more and more purchse from a line; less rope under same load gives even more tension on high tension side of friction).

Sir Brion Toss tells grueling stories of men at sea with nothing but the wind power they could capture to get home; losing or breaking the al'mighty capstan crank that tensioned sail lines etc. They would pull the line tight with the capstan redirect to deck what they could with several men, then 1 bends the line sharply on the higher tension/ sail side; and the other man/men snatch the rope purchase form this sweat' thru the capstan to adjsut sail, and keep the purchase, and go for more. All this at night, in the wind, starving, sick and wet; without radio or any convenience they saved their lives, if they could live another 20 daze or so until port.

Pulleys give additive, arithmetic increases in a system; then multiplying between systems; with inline pull direction. But, with leveraged input/ non-line direction input on these, or any legs of line to load/target; we can immeidiatley get high multiplying/ geometric increase in power in a short, but very powerful range. The loss of power by this strategy is much quicker than the loss of power by 'sloppy angles' in inline/pulley type of strategy. This one trick of quick high power potential in a with perpendiucalr input on a tensioned line has saved my bacon, made my job easier, some tricks possible that otherwise wouldn't work. Just like those swash buckling men at sea in Toss's stories; by keeping these principals in mind and practice!

Even in tie downs i will zrig to pretighten and stiffen the line; then really levgerage it tighter with a bend. So the zrig is just the preset; then multiply it's multiplier!
 
Fascinating, Spyder.

I think you're saying a side pull on a taut line creates "potential" slack, which is then taken up by the original rigging, then repeated?

Have you read Patrick Obrian's novels? They're fiction, but seem very authentic, especially in terms of the mechanics and art of 19th century British Navy sailing ships. The movie "Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World" is based on one. I'm making a note of Sir Brion Toss.
 
3 parts simple machine Input force/man, friction brake/buffer and output/ load side of friction.

Taut line creates resistance to bend; so bend load side of line with sideways force(after it is already under tension). This bending something resistant to bending gives leverage increasing line tension. Snatch sharply some of the higher tension produced by bend on load side to your hold side of the friction brake as the bend giving high tension on load side is relaxed; to bring/purchase rope length to your side of friction brake/buffer; leaving straight, but less line on load side. So load side is now carrying more tension and/or load has moved to make up the differance. Brion toss says that it doesn't even take friction, can jsut do with pulley as inbetween point. But that would be some real sharp snatches; and intree setups i never got to explore that one a whole lot.

i've 'eared of the novels (possibly from Tom?); but not read. World reknowned master rigger, splicer, writer (Mr. Knot on old PBS boating series) Brion Toss talks of these things in Rigger's Apprentice books , online etc.

Incurring friction in tightening inline with pulleys works agaisnt ya; here is the flip side where we capitalize on the friction to tighten line; by flipping the direction switch to the other setting.

Real power, but over short range. Good for final tightening, doing as part of checking lines, squeaking by, and these quick purchase bursts etc.; very workable.
 
Ya mean like d-d-draw you sumetin'?
shocked.gif


Intense Seat in Rigging shows using sweating to slightly lift load or just pretension lines. Mostly as i check for tightness before cutting; i also use this to sweat play out of the lines. But this shows more ground maneuvers for 2 remote sweats, and pretenisioning Porty. All of capturing high leveraged potential; so line tension more equals the load before cutting, so at release there is more float. Can also be used for lifting a load a few increments at a time that is about to go on wrong side of fence etc.

"Which Tie Down?" isn't about all of sweating line, but jsut the part about the concept of bending a line to increase line tension; for tiedowns. This shows that while spread angles on a Zrig tie down is a loss of tension potential; that same failing of angled/ spread lines (not-inline pulls) can be capitalized on; for an even better tie down. So, in tiedown points are inline, or spread; there is a strategy for either one.

Double Leveraged Tiedowns is similar, but shows a pair of straight Zrigs; without spread angles to capitalize on; can be bent by each other; and even several turns taken to increase the bending input force, for higher output.

Things to remember; msut start with tight line, then bend across it; this higher leverage drops sharply after about 40 degrees from straight; and this is angled/rotational leverage-so direction of pull changes too.

These are some of the earlier drawings; i've been werking on another slicker, smoother line sweating one; in my 'spare' time..
crazy.gif
 

New threads New posts

Back
Top Bottom