This idea is slilly, it'll never work. Two small problems: time and distance. To reduce impact force on a climber, a safety device has to extend the time of the fall. That needs distance, like the Yates Screamers. That's never going to happen with a metallic structure the size of a climbing thimble.
The name is wrong. Not a "safety thimble", how about an "indicating thimble". Picture a climbing thimble with two little tabs maybe a quarter of an inch apart. If the thimble sees more than, say, 1000 pounds, it deforms permanently and the tabs bend together to touch each other. It becomes an indicator that the climb system has been overloaded and needs to be inspected/replaced.
I'm trying to imagine a lightweight climbing thimble that will pass a 5000+ lb. system certification due to the strength of its cordage but it only packs enough steel/aluminum to deliver a 2x overload of its working load. Remember I'm trying to get to something lightweight and cheap to use in the U-SAVER, but I think the thimble could be useful in other climbing and rigging.
Thoughts?